How ecotourism works at the community-level: the case of whale-watching in the Azores

Abstract

Whale-watching is one of the fastest growing tourism industries worldwide, often viewed as a sustainable, non-consumptive strategy for the benefits of cetacean conservation and the coastal communities, alternative to and incompatible with whaling. Yet there is paucity of research on how things actually work out at the community-level. Drawing on research literature and my own ethnographic fieldwork, this article bridges a knowledge gap in this field while examining an Azorean context where tourism has brought a re-commodification of the whale for the community (observing wildlife as opposed to harpooning it) in the last 20 years. The analysis is focused on the four main community-level implications: governance of common maritime resources, and tourism's contribution to economic sustainability, cultural identity and social relations. It is shown that whale-watching, as any other form of community-based ecotourism, is not a panacea that always promotes biodiversity conservation and economic and sociocultural sustainability for the host communities. Moreover, expanding on the theorisation of emerging institutional fields by Lawrence and Phillips, the political, historical, economic and sociocultural context of the community involved is a key factor for understanding local agency and the local specific features of new fields.

Are we killing them with kindness? Evaluation of sustainable marine wildlife tourism

“…These tourism practices have been considered socio-economically successful and ecologically sustainable in the shortterm (Burgin and Hardiman, 2015) based on loose definitions and contextual goals. However, there is considerable controversy now surrounding many of these ventures because of their impacts on habitat and/or species involved (Silva, 2015). Although the changes observed are often classified as case-specific or temporary (Apps et al, 2015;Barker et al, 2011a), the continuous presence and cumulative effect of such negative impacts is likely to have long-term consequences (Barker et al, 2011b) such as decrease in health or reproductive fitness (e.g.…”

Rural tourism and national identity building in contemporary Europe: Evidence from Portugal

“…Yet, research has shown that, in spite of the positive effects that it may have in some cases, tourism is not a remedy to the problems facing rural areas, that not all rural spaces are suitable for the development of tourism and, similarly, that tourism development often fails to stimulate the anticipated socioeconomic revitalisation (e.g. Iorio and Corsale, 2010;OECD, 1994;Silva, 2015;Walmsley, 2003). National identity is commonly described in the scholarly literature as an individual identification and as a specific form of collective identity, in the construction of which the existence of a common past plays a critical role (e.g.…”

From sea monsters to charismatic megafauna: Changes in perception and use of large marine animals

“…a use of a resource in ways that do not reduce its supply. Some authors have questioned the use of the term 'non-consumptive' in the context of whale watching (see [94] for a discussion on this issue) since there is evidence that the intensification of whale-watching activities may have a negative impact on cetaceans, altering their short and/or long-term behavior patterns and leading to displacement, progressively affecting the animals’ health and therefore their survival [95–98]. Current conservation measures should therefore include not only population management, but also the management/regulation/control of human activities that can affect whales and dolphins.…”