How educational innovations and attention to competencies in postgraduate medical education relate to preparedness for practice: the key role of the learning environment

Abstract

IntroductionMany training programmes in postgraduate medical education (PGME) have introduced competency frameworks, but the effects of this change on preparedness for practice are unknown. Therefore, we explored how elements of competency-based programmes in PGME (educational innovations, attention to competencies and learning environment) were related to perceived preparedness for practice among new consultants.MethodsA questionnaire was distributed among 330 new consultants. Respondents rated how well their PGME training programme prepared them for practice, the extent to which educational innovations (portfolio, Mini-CEX) were implemented, and how much attention was paid to CanMEDS competencies during feedback and coaching, and they answered questions on the learning environment and general self-efficacy. Multiple regression and mediation analyses were used to analyze data.ResultsThe response rate was 43 % (143/330). Controlling for self-efficacy and gender, the learning environment was the strongest predictor of preparedness for practice (B = 0.42, p < 0.001), followed by attention to competencies (B = 0.29, p < 0.01). Educational innovations were not directly related to preparedness for practice. The overall model explained 52 % of the variance in preparedness for practice. Attention to competencies mediated the relationship between educational innovations and preparedness for practice. This mediation became stronger at higher learning environment values.ConclusionsThe learning environment plays a key role in determining the degree to which competency-based PGME prepares trainees for independent practice.

A national stakeholder consensus study of challenges and priorities for clinical learning environments in postgraduate medical education

“…The impact of such changes on day to day learning and supervision has been questioned [ 59 , 61 ]. Dijkstra et al [ 13 ] found the influence of structural changes on trainees’ learning was mediated by ‘on the ground’ features of the clinical learning environment. It has been suggested that local approaches to cultural change may be effective [ 59 , 62 ] in improving clinical learning environments.…”

Resident burnout: evaluating the role of the learning environment

“…The way people in a particular department approach the process of learning is considered a reflection of the learning environment [ 19 ]. This learning environment is thought to play a key role in the development of residents towards independent practice [ 20 ]. It has been hypothesized that the learning environment could be an important driver of burnout [ 6 , 17 , 20 , 21 ].…”

The learning environment and resident burnout: a&nbsp;national study

“…When it concerns resident doctors, this working environment resembles the learning environment [ 11 ], which is a construct that includes formal and informal aspects of the training program, organizational aspects within the teaching hospital [ 12 ] as well as the overall atmosphere [ 13 ]. The learning environment is thought to play a key role in the development of residents towards independent practice [ 14 ] and it has been postulated to be an important contributor to burnout [ 2 ]. A previous content analysis of instruments that assess the learning environment showed that the majority of the items of these instruments relate to a theoretical framework that characterizes the learning environment in three broad domains: the content of the program, the interpersonal aspects and atmosphere of the program, and the structure and organization of the program [ 15 ].…”