How effective are organizational-level interventions in improving the psychosocial work environment, health, and retention of workers? A systematic overview of systematic reviews

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to systematically review the effectiveness of organizational-level interventions in improving the psychosocial work environment and workers’ health and retention. METHODS: We conducted an overview of systematic reviews on organizational-level interventions published between 2000 and 2020. We systematically searched academic databases, screened reference lists, and contacted experts, yielding 27 736 records. Of the 76 eligible reviews, 24 of weak quality were excluded, yielding 52 reviews of moderate (N=32) or strong (N=20) quality, covering 957 primary studies. We assessed quality of evidence based on quality of review, consistency of results, and proportion of controlled studies. RESULTS: Of the 52 reviews, 30 studied a specific intervention approach and 22 specific outcomes. Regarding intervention approaches, we found strong quality of evidence for interventions focusing on “changes in working time arrangements” and moderate quality of evidence for “influence on work tasks or work organization”, “health care approach changes”, and “improvements of the psychosocial work environment”. Regarding outcomes, we found strong quality of evidence for interventions about “burnout” and moderate quality evidence for “various health and wellbeing outcomes”. For all other types of interventions, quality of evidence was either low or inconclusive, including interventions on retention. CONCLUSIONS: This overview of reviews identified strong or moderate quality of evidence for the effectiveness of organizational-level interventions for four specific intervention approaches and two health outcomes. This suggests that the work environment and the health of employees can be improved by certain organizational-level interventions. We need more research, especially about implementation and context, to improve the evidence.

A Framework for Protecting and Promoting Employee Mental Health through Supervisor Supportive Behaviors

“…Furthermore, despite decades of research on workplace hazards relating to psychological health and well-being of workers, organizational scholars argue that there is a dearth of research specifically focused on evidence-based workplace mental health interventions that take organizational-level approaches, as opposed to individual-approaches (Anger et al, 2023; Aust et al, 2023 ; Rosado-Solomon et al, 2023 ). Yet, the recent American Psychological Association.…”

Effects of a participatory work stress prevention approach for employees in primary education: results of a quasi-experimental study

“…These findings suggest that, when implemented successfully (that is, when employees are informed and involved, team and management is considered committed, and employees noticed actions or changes being implemented), the work stress prevention approach is potentially effective in decreasing work stress determinants as identified in the logic model of change that may reduce emotional exhaustion in a longer term. Finding effects on secondary outcomes (work stress determinants), but not on primary outcomes (emotional exhaustion), appears to be a common phenomenon according to a recent review of reviews on organizational-interventions to improve the psychosocial work environment ( 14 ). A possible explanation for not finding a direct effect of the approach on emotional exhaustion could be related to the timing of the measurements.…”

Working hours and health – key research topics in the past and future

“…WTC may also moderate the effects of overtime work and reduce the adverse health consequences of long working weeks ( 72 ). In an overview of systematic reviews, the importance of interventions in both working time arrangements and WTC were emphasized ( 73 ).…”