2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2020.102192
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How electoral reform alters legislative speech: Evidence from the parliament of Victoria, Australia 1992–2017

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, pre-post event studies cannot account for unobserved time-varying confounder and therefore cannot rule out that the effect attributed to the electoral reform is driven by a time trend unrelated to the institutional change (Ishima 2020). To address this shortcoming, I argue that studying mixed systems that undergo electoral reform yields more credible causal evidence of the effects of electoral rules.…”
Section: Electoral Incentives and Mps' Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, pre-post event studies cannot account for unobserved time-varying confounder and therefore cannot rule out that the effect attributed to the electoral reform is driven by a time trend unrelated to the institutional change (Ishima 2020). To address this shortcoming, I argue that studying mixed systems that undergo electoral reform yields more credible causal evidence of the effects of electoral rules.…”
Section: Electoral Incentives and Mps' Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, speech data disaggregated by topic offer advantages. First, it allows us to analyze more closely the congruence between constituency characteristics and representation (Ishima 2020; Quinn et al 2010). Second, it allows us to examine whether these representational linkages vary according to the forum in which speeches take place and the topic at hand.…”
Section: Speech Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Constituency-focused speechmaking is vital to legislators elected in candidate-centered electoral systems. They can use speeches to address policy matters important to constituents, show concern for the well-being of the district’s businesses and labor organizations, and praise relevant individuals or groups in their districts (Dockendorf 2018; Ishima 2020). Modeling speech topics can help assess the consequences of the electoral connection and the congruence between constituency traits and representation (Quinn et al 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%