This article poses a challenge to contemporary theories in psychology that portray empathy as a negative force in the moral life. Instead, drawing on alternative psychological and philosophical literature, especially Martha Nussbaum, I argue that empathy is related to the virtue of compassion and therefore crucial for moral action. Evidence for evolutionary anthropological accounts of compassion in early hominins provides additional arguments for its positive value in deep human history. I discuss this work alongside Thomistic notions of practical wisdom, compassion, misericordia, and the importance of reason in the moral life. The tension between "bottom up" accounts of empathy and that according to a theological interpretation of "infused" virtues also needs to be addressed. From a secular perspective, infused virtue is a projection of the ideal moral life, but from a theological perspective, it is a way of understanding how human capacities through the action of grace can reach beyond what seem to be the limits of psychological moral identity.The burgeoning research on the psychology of empathy has clustered around its lack of expression in psychopathy and provided the important insight that the absence of the ability to feel emotions, including empathy, opens the door to immorality (Schleim 2015). 1 Michael Spezio (2015a) takes a more positive approach to empathy by stressing its role in character formation and the development of love and compassion. He pushes against the view that reason in the moral life works in opposition to the emotions.