2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2009.01168.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How employment support and social integration programmes are viewed by the intellectually disabled

Abstract: From the perspective of people with an intellectual disability supported employment contributes to self-development and has a positive effect on well-being, albeit in different ways for the individual groups.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
31
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the transition to adulthood, similar to their healthy peers, the young disabled desire independence and autonomy, including financial independence and a normal social life [2]. Employment plays an important role in independence and autonomy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the transition to adulthood, similar to their healthy peers, the young disabled desire independence and autonomy, including financial independence and a normal social life [2]. Employment plays an important role in independence and autonomy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to financial consequences, unemployment has negative effects on quality of life and mental health and may contribute to marginalisation from a normal social life [2,[6][7][8]. The young disabled have the same rights as their healthy peers to gain employment despite the limitations in receiving assistance in finding, obtaining and maintaining employment [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While there have been a number of studies on satisfaction with (health) services among those with learning disabilities using a range of designs (Copeland et al, 2014), prioritisation tasks have been used mainly with regard to inclusive research agenda-setting using 'money bags' to convey weighted importance (Nierse & Abma, 2011) and Q-sorting exercises, where the playful context of ranking cards onto a score sheet appeared to stimulate an open and positive interaction (Cramm et al, 2009). In our study, we sought to rank oral healthcare priorities, which is a complex task.…”
Section: Methodological Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Q-methodology is perhaps fairly novel in transportation research, but it has been around for about 75 years (Stephenson 1935) and is well-established in the political and social sciences (De Graaf 2005;De Graaf and van Exel 2009;Durning 1999;Ellis et al 2007;Niemeyer et al 2005;Steelman and Maguire 1999;Van Eeten 2000) and health services research (Baker 2006;Boot et al 2009;Bryant et al 2006;Cramm et al 2009;Jedeloo et al 2010;Kreuger et al 2008;Risdon et al 2003;Stenner et al 2000;Tielen et al 2008;Van Exel et al 2006, 2007. The number of published Q-studies in transportation research is limited.…”
Section: What Is Q-methodology?mentioning
confidence: 99%