1992
DOI: 10.1207/s15327663jcp0102_03
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Enduring and Situational Involvement Combine to Create Involvement Responses

Abstract: Although a two‐component model of product involvement is widely accepted, research has not studied how enduring and situational involvement combine to affect consumer responses. This article investigates three combination models. In particular, an additive model is compared with two interaction models, and the three models are tested empirically using field surveys. Results suggest that preexisting levels of enduring involvement neither magnify nor suppress situational involvement effects occurring around the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
58
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
4
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since all other scales were of Likert type, we were concerned that respondents would simply regard the items for involvement as all referring to the scale on a continuum between 'strongly disagree' and 'strongly agree.' First, situational involvement was defined as the consumer's temporary perception of product importance that accompanies a particular purchase situation based on the consumer's desire to meet extrinsic goals deriving from the purchase and/or usage of the product (Bloch & Richins, 1983;Richins et al, 1992). In this study, the scale of situational product involvement is based on Zaichkowsky (1994) and consists of seven key items, including "important," "excited," "interesting," "needed," "means a lot," "uninvolving," and "fascinating."…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since all other scales were of Likert type, we were concerned that respondents would simply regard the items for involvement as all referring to the scale on a continuum between 'strongly disagree' and 'strongly agree.' First, situational involvement was defined as the consumer's temporary perception of product importance that accompanies a particular purchase situation based on the consumer's desire to meet extrinsic goals deriving from the purchase and/or usage of the product (Bloch & Richins, 1983;Richins et al, 1992). In this study, the scale of situational product involvement is based on Zaichkowsky (1994) and consists of seven key items, including "important," "excited," "interesting," "needed," "means a lot," "uninvolving," and "fascinating."…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This situationally involved consumer would be much worried that the new necklace ordered might not perform to his expectations, until he finally receives and tests it out. As Richins, Bloch, and McQuarrie (1992) suggest, when a product is important to a consumer, the stakes associated with its purchase increase. Thus, the consumer may fear that the necklace product might be defective, be visually unattractive, or not be genuine.…”
Section: H1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two items (e.g., "If I were to purchase GM food I would first obtain substantial information about particular types of GM food products") measuring the consumer's propensity to search for information were taken from Richins, Bloch, and McQuarrie (1992) and measured with a 7-point Likert-type scale.…”
Section: Propensity To Search For Information On Gm Foodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of involvement arises as a result of ongoing interest with behavior or products and its association with the consumer's self-concept, ego and values (Richins and Bloch, 1986). Enduring involvement is considered to be a stable trait (Richins et al, 1992) and is often contrasted with situational involvement, which rather relates to temporary feelings of involvement. We decided to focus on this part of involvement, as it is more related to how people are and not so much to how they feel in a particular situation.…”
Section: H1mentioning
confidence: 99%