How Environmental Beliefs Affect Consumer Willingness to Pay for the Greenness Premium of Low-Carbon Agricultural Products in China: Theoretical Model and Survey-based Evidence

Abstract

The increase in the supply of low-carbon agricultural products is crucial to reduce carbon emissions, but the production of such products incurs additional input costs and thus the crux of the low-carbon agricultural products market development lies in how such cost can be shared in a reasonable manner. The increase of consumer willingness to pay and the premium level that consumers would pay for green products hold the key to address this challenge. For that reason, this paper first constructs a behavioral game model to explore how environmental beliefs would affect consumer willingness to pay for the greenness premium. Then, the paper proceeds with empirical analyses on factors influencing consumer willingness to pay for the greenness premium by using micro-survey data of Chinese consumers when facing the choices of low-carbon rice in the cities of central China. The empirical research suggests that, although the average greenness premium that Chinese consumers are willing to pay for low-carbon agricultural products is low, the greenness premium will be stronger when consumers have higher environmental beliefs. We also find the impacts of environmental beliefs on the willingness to pay as well as the greenness premium levels that consumers are willing to pay for low-carbon agricultural products increase with education attainment and family income, but do not change with age. Findings in this study carry several important policy implications. To encourage green consumption that facilitates green production, the government should devote attempts to promote consumers’ environmental beliefs and also apply differentiated public policy that targeting at different types of consumers.

Knowledge Mapping of Carbon Footprint Research in a LCA Perspective: A Visual Analysis Using CiteSpace

“…On the one hand, compared with obscure terms like Multi-Region Input-Output Model (MRIO) and LCA, carbon footprint is simple, easy to understand and interesting. The wide spreading and extensive application of this concept may have influenced people's behaviours of environmental impact [48]. On the one hand, the concept of carbon footprint provides new ideas for assessing other environmental impact factors and has inspired the proposal of water footprint, ecology footprint, energy footprint and even the family of footprints.…”

Optimising Decarbonisation Investment for Firms towards Environmental Sustainability

“…Rhee [3] Consumer heterogeneity Unobservable Two-stage game framework Chen [13] Consumers' preferences Environmental standards Quality-based model Amacher et al [4] Eco-friendly preferences Consumer can observe Three-stage game model firm's investment levels Conrad [5] Environmental awareness Select its product Spatial duopoly model characteristic and then its price Liu et al [6] Environmental awareness Various eco-friendly operation Two-stage Stackelberg models Sheu and Chen [14] Tax and subsidy policies Three-stage game theoretic model Zhang et al [7] Environmental awareness Production capacity constraint Centralised/decentralised models Hafezalkotob [15] Financial intervention Price competition model Guo et al [16] Different subsidy policies Game and optimisation theories Bi et al [17] Environmentally discerning Subsidy policy Stackelberg model Gao and Zheng [18] Environmental awareness Environmental concerns Three-stage Stackelberg model Xu et al [8] Without and with Analytical model consumer heterogeneity Jin et al [19] Carbon tax policy Centralised data envelopment analysis Zhong and Chen [9] Willingness to pay for Behavioural game model the greenness premium Gao et al [20] Environmental awareness Tax deduction incentive Emission-dependent demand Stackelberg game model Yenipazarli [21] Emission tax Environmental R&D incentives Two-stage duopoly model Zhao and Chen [22] Environmental awareness Subsidy mechanism Principal-agent models…”

“…In addition, the effects of consumer heterogeneity under different competition intensities are also determined. Zhong and Chen [9] constructed a behavioural game model to explore how environmental beliefs affect consumer willingness to pay for the greenness premium. They used survey data of consumer choices of low-carbon rice within central Chinese cities to analyse factors influencing consumer willingness to pay for the greenness premium.…”

Is Agricultural Emissions Mitigation on the Menu for Tea Drinkers?

“…Other research shows that shopping habits, health concerns, and knowledge of environmental issues including climate change are associated with willingness to pay premiums [2,[28][29][30][31]. However, studies do not consistently find that positive attitudes toward improving society or the environment are correlated with consumer willingness to pay more for such product attributes, and the literature has pointed out a consistent gap between consumer purchase intentions and what they actually purchase [2,[32][33][34][35]. In the U.S. context, little is known about the link between U.S. consumer motivations for purchasing carbon-friendly food and beverage products.…”