How equal is the relationship between individual social capital and psychological distress? A gendered analysis using cross-sectional data from Ghent (Belgium)

Abstract

BackgroundSocial capital has been related to various aspects of health. While literature suggests that men and women differently access and mobilize social capital, gender has received little attention within social capital research. This study examines whether the association between individual social capital and psychological distress is different for men and women.MethodsWe made use of data from a representative sample of 1025 adults within 50 neighbourhoods of Ghent (Belgium), collected in the context of the cross-sectional Social capital and Well-being In Neighbourhoods in Ghent (SWING) Survey 2011. Six components of social capital were discerned: generalized trust, social support, social influence, social engagement and attachment, the volume of social capital and the mean occupational prestige in one’s network. Multilevel linear regression models were fitted to explore interactions between gender and these components of social capital.ResultsIn accordance with previous research, men report lower levels of psychological distress than women (t = 4.40, p < 0.001). Regarding the gender gap in social capital, the findings are mixed. Only for half of the social capital variables (social support, social influence and volume of social capital), a significant gender difference is found, favouring men (t = 4.03, p < 0.001; t = 1.99, p < 0.001 and t = 4.50, p < 0.001 respectively). None of the analysed interaction terms between gender and social capital is significantly related to psychological distress.ConclusionThe analyses indicate that the association between individual social capital and psychological distress is similar for men and women. The relatively low level of gender stratification in Belgium might have influenced this finding. Furthermore, it is possible that social capital is not of greater importance for women in general, but mainly for women who are in an especially vulnerable social situation that deprives their access to alternative resources (e.g. unemployed women, single mothers). Future studies should seek to identify subgroups for whom social capital might be particularly influential, by transcending ‘simple’ dyads such as ‘men versus women’.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2458-14-960) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Social capital – a mixed blessing for women? A cross-sectional study of different forms of social relations and self-rated depression in Moscow

“…Researchers should try to identify the forms of social relations that are most valuable as well as most burdening for various groups. When studying social capital and depression, as noted by Vyncke et al [ 44 ], a combination of dimensions, such as gender and age, should be analysed. A special focus should be placed on bridging social relations among women, particularly mothers with small children, to better understand the complex association between social capital, gender and depression in Russia and elsewhere.…”

“…In relation to this, many scholars have stressed the importance of comparing different groups when studying the association between social capital and health [ 43 ]. Vyncke et al ([ 44 ], p. 960), for instance, recently wrote that: “Future studies should seek to identify subgroups for whom social capital might be particularly influential, by transcending ‘simple’ dyads such as ‘men versus women’”.…”

“…Gender differences have received relatively little attention in social capital research [ 44 ]. It has been found, though, that women tend to be more family-oriented, often occupying the role of “kin-keeper” in the family [ 45 ].…”

Neighborhood social capital and sleep duration: a population based cross-sectional study in a rural Japanese town

“…However few studies described the direct relationship between NSC and sleep disorders [ 9 , 10 ]. In addition, NSC differs between the genders in terms of social networks and opportunities to invest in social capital [ 11 ]. For instance, Elisabetta Addis and Majlinda Joxhe presented that men and women differ in network structure and accumulation of social capital which is not only reflecting the basic biological sex but also the diverse constructs of behavior, attitude and norms of the society [ 12 ].…”

Engagement with health care providers as a mediator between social capital and quality of life among a sample of people living with HIV in the United States: Path-analysis

“…The impact of neighborhood factors on birth outcomes, such as low birth weight, is well documented ( Metcalfe, Lail, Ghali, & Sauve, 2011 ). The importance of social capital is greater for marginalized population such as homeless individuals ( Hwang et al, 2009 ) and women in vulnerable and deprived situations ( Vyncke et al, 2014 ).…”