2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11692-020-09520-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Exactly Did the Nose Get That Long? A Critical Rethinking of the Pinocchio Effect and How Shape Changes Relate to Landmarks

Abstract: The Pinocchio effect has long been discussed in the literature on geometric morphometrics. It denotes the observation that Procrustes superimposition tends to distribute shape changes over many landmarks, even though a different superimposition may exist for the same landmark configurations that concentrates changes in just one or a few landmarks. This is widely seen as a flaw of Procrustes methods. Visualizations illustrating the Pinocchio effect use a comparison of the same pair of shapes superimposed in two… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It should be noted that Procrustes superimposition changes perceived patterns of variation in landmark coordinates, often rather drastically (Rohlf & Slice, 1990; Walker, 2000). Such phenomena are probably to be seen as properties of shape variables, rather than necessarily nuisance artefacts (Klingenberg, 2021). Whether these can be of concern or not would depend on the scope of individual analyses (see also Machado et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that Procrustes superimposition changes perceived patterns of variation in landmark coordinates, often rather drastically (Rohlf & Slice, 1990; Walker, 2000). Such phenomena are probably to be seen as properties of shape variables, rather than necessarily nuisance artefacts (Klingenberg, 2021). Whether these can be of concern or not would depend on the scope of individual analyses (see also Machado et al, 2019).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is only possible with all the hand bones in one morphospace and all the foot bones in another. Moreover, Klingenberg (2021) states that there is no basis for the preference of methods that adjust for the Pinocchio effect. Furthermore, several analyses were repeated without the thumb and the big toes to show that those two bones do not have a large effect on the combined morphospace.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the GPA was performed based on relatively distinct forms (lateral toes and fingers vs. pollex and hallux). If the difference in specific landmarks is excessive between specimens, this could possibly lead to a Pinocchio effect (e.g., Klingenberg, 2021), which affects the position of other landmarks in the configuration. Furthermore, the distinct forms (ray 1) could hinder differences amongst forms that are more similar in the dataset (rays 2–5).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, an actual bird bill and its image on a digital platform are two different icons for the bill shape. Thus, much of our thought about shape and shape variation involves icons rather than actual specimens, which applies to statistical analyses (Klingenberg 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%