How Existing Business Management Concepts Become School Leadership Fashions

Abstract

Purpose: This article examines the history of three management concepts that originated in the business sector and progressed to the K-12 education sector. Framework: We propose a new conceptual model intended to help illuminate how ideas and strategies originally created for business leadership gain influence in the realm of K-12 school leadership. We build upon existing research into the history of educational reform and relevant studies of organizational management fads and fashions. Methods: We focused on three business management concepts that emerged in the past four decades as school leadership fashions: Management by Objectives, Total Quality Management, and Turnaround. We analyzed relevant data by mapping lines of business management influence on school leadership, tabulating fashion-related document appearances in the Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC) database, and charting the appearance of business-inspired fashions in consecutive editions of prominent educational leadership textbooks. Findings: An existing business management concept, after a time lag, crosses borders from business to education. Various stakeholders serve as fashion setters who help the incipient innovation become an influential, attention-grabbing school management fashion that receives broad but fleeting attention in K-12 education before fading away as a discarded reform. Over the last four decades, this cyclical process has served as an accumulating fashion trend in which existing (and possibly outdated) business management techniques are routinely positioned as promising, innovative K-12 educational solutions. Implications: We conclude by offering thoughts on implications and suggestions for future study, including asking whether “locally sourced” management innovation can and should exist in K-12 school leadership.

Practical Experiences with the Application of Corporate Social Responsibility Principles in a Higher Education Environment

“…There are also contextual problems that hinder the implementation of the ISO 26000 at universities. Universities have been steadily avoiding management-oriented approaches [80,81], which can become a principal barrier to the implementation of sustainability and social responsibility ideas contained in the standard. Social responsibility is a very broad field and the ISO 26000 only focuses on its essential elements.…”

Exploring metaphoric language use to assess collaboration between educational institutions

“…In education, metaphor has been used to explore the administrative work of schools, such as the previously cited comparison of schools to businesses when analysing leadership structures (Hoyle and Wallace 2007;Peck and Reitzug 2012); as well as the development of teacher identity through exploration of personal metaphors that expose a teacher's beliefs about his or her roles and responsibilities (Bullough and Stokes 1994;Pinnegar et al 2011;Stofflett 1996). Lowenhaupt (2014) states, 'talk is not just a medium of practice but … it is in fact an explicit feature of practice to which school principals and scholars of education administration must attend' (3).…”

Gestión de la calidad educativa en educación superior del sector privado

“…Por supuesto, hay varios modelos para la evaluación educativa con base en los modelos de calidad empresarial (Peck & Reitzug, 2012), entre ellos, el modelo Baldridge, una lista de criterios que proporciona una estructura integral para evaluar instituciones educativas (Furst-Bowe & Bauer, 2007). De acuerdo con Furst-Bowe y Bauer, el modelo surgió primero para evaluar la competitividad de compañías manufactureras en Estados Unidos y luego fue revisado y modificado para organizaciones educativas y de la salud a mediados de la década del noventa.…”

“…Tiene ocho criterios de guía: Enfoque en el cliente; Orientación hacia resultados; Liderazgo y propósito; Participación y desarrollo humano; Manejo de procesos y datos; Desarrollo de socios; Responsabilidad social corporativa; y Aprendizaje continuo, innovación y mejora (Steed, Maslow & Mazaletskaya, 2005). Dado que el tema es controversial, este modelo tiene detractores que consideran que dichos modelos de evaluación tienen deficiencias conceptuales, que no pueden enfrentar las particularidades de la educación superior y que son modas destinadas a desaparecer (Temple, 2005) o modas que se repiten en ciclos (Peck & Reitzug, 2012).…”