2000
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.236441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Experience and Network Ties Affect the Influence of Demographic Minorities on Corporate Boards

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.This content downloaded from 128.83.205.78 on Thu,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
82
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
4
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, when the majority of group members share a particular background, for instance, the influence exerted by a director with a different background can lead board members to change or expand the criteria used for evaluating strategic alternatives (Hitt and Tyler, 1991). This pattern of results may suggest that minority directors (as women) have the potential to contribute to board decision-making by providing unique perspectives on strategic issues and by prompting divergent thinking among the majority group (Westphal and Milton, 2000). According to this perspective, reaching a critical number of women directors is desirable because it not only affects the nature of group interactions but also increases the diversity of viewpoints within a group.…”
Section: The Mediating Role Of Board Strategic Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, when the majority of group members share a particular background, for instance, the influence exerted by a director with a different background can lead board members to change or expand the criteria used for evaluating strategic alternatives (Hitt and Tyler, 1991). This pattern of results may suggest that minority directors (as women) have the potential to contribute to board decision-making by providing unique perspectives on strategic issues and by prompting divergent thinking among the majority group (Westphal and Milton, 2000). According to this perspective, reaching a critical number of women directors is desirable because it not only affects the nature of group interactions but also increases the diversity of viewpoints within a group.…”
Section: The Mediating Role Of Board Strategic Tasksmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An agency-theoretic rationale for these findings would go as follows: women (like external stakeholders, ethnic minorities, and foreigners) often bring a fresh perspective on complex issues, and this can help correct informational biases in strategy formulation and problem solving (Dewatripont et al, 1999;Westphal and Milton, 2000).…”
Section: Agency Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While much of the research on TMTs has used secondary databases such as Duns (Cohen & Bailey, 1997) (Pegels et al, 2000;Westphal & Milton, 2000). Primary data have been obtained from personal interviews with the top managers involved in the reference sample.…”
Section: Data Sourcementioning
confidence: 99%