2005
DOI: 10.1370/afm.346
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Experiencing Preventable Medical Problems Changed Patients' Interactions With Primary Health Care

Abstract: PURPOSE We wanted to explore how patients' experiences with preventable problems in primary care have changed their behavioral interactions with the health care system. METHODSWe conducted semistructured interviews with 24 primary care patients, asking them to describe their experiences with self-perceived preventable problems. We analyzed these interviews using the editing method and classifi ed emotional and behavioral responses to experiencing preventable problems. RESULTSAnger was the most common emotional… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
38
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
3
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another sign of trust was the participants' inclination to make excuses for the healthcare professionals when something went wrong. Patients with high levels of trust in their healthcare professionals feel more safe,43 whereas patients with experience of an adverse event lose trust 44…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another sign of trust was the participants' inclination to make excuses for the healthcare professionals when something went wrong. Patients with high levels of trust in their healthcare professionals feel more safe,43 whereas patients with experience of an adverse event lose trust 44…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is currently in place in these areas is not working, and transformation requires everyone's commitment. Unless the current record of adverse events and the treatment of patients and families change, Canadians will not trust the healthcare system and will choose to enter it only with a second medical opinion (Elder et al 2005) and legal advice. This latter is not the best solution for anyone.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, a large proportion of screening participants are unaware they may have a colorectal cancer despite a negative FOBt result (17). Anger and mistrust in the medical profession have been reported as common responses to medical errors in primary care (18), and in the field of antenatal screening, a false-negative result has been associated with poorer acceptance of a child with Downs' syndrome than if screening was declined (19). These findings suggest that if people believe there has been a medical "error" or delay in diagnosing their cancer, their adjustment may be compromised as a result.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%