2020
DOI: 10.3390/universe6100170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Extra Symmetries Affect Solutions in General Relativity

Abstract: To get exact solutions to Einstein’s field equations in general relativity, one has to impose some symmetry requirements. Otherwise, the equations are too difficult to solve. However, sometimes, the imposition of too much extra symmetry can cause the problem to become somewhat trivial. As a typical example to illustrate this, the effects of conharmonic flatness are studied and applied to Friedmann–Lemaitre–Robertson–Walker spacetime. Hence, we need to impose some symmetry to make the problem tractable, but not… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even in modified gravity theories the situation does not improve much, it ends up resulting into vanishing effective pressure and energy density. We further can add to the findings of the article [22] that instead of conharmonic flatness if one imposes divergence free conharmonic curvature into the geometry, then the Ricci scalar R of the spacetime is constant and the Ricci curvature tensor is of Codazzi type. Therefore, same conclusions as in theorem 4.1 and theorem 4.2 follow from similar arguments.…”
Section: Projectively Harmonic Spacetimementioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even in modified gravity theories the situation does not improve much, it ends up resulting into vanishing effective pressure and energy density. We further can add to the findings of the article [22] that instead of conharmonic flatness if one imposes divergence free conharmonic curvature into the geometry, then the Ricci scalar R of the spacetime is constant and the Ricci curvature tensor is of Codazzi type. Therefore, same conclusions as in theorem 4.1 and theorem 4.2 follow from similar arguments.…”
Section: Projectively Harmonic Spacetimementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Remark 4.1. In [22], the authors rightly showed that conharmonic flatness in a spacetime constrains the standard theory of gravity to a trivial vacuum case with = R 0 ij and R = 0 case. Even in modified gravity theories the situation does not improve much, it ends up resulting into vanishing effective pressure and energy density.…”
Section: Projectively Harmonic Spacetimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We further can add to the findings of the article [22] that instead of conharmonic flatness if one imposes divergence free conharmonic curvature into the geometry, then the Ricci scalar R of the spacetime is constant and the Ricci curvature tensor is of Codazzi type. Therefore, same conclusions as in Theorem 4.1 and Theorem 4.2 follow from similar arguments.…”
Section: Projectively Harmonic Spacetimementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Remark 4.1. In [22], the authors rightly showed that conharmonic flatness in a spacetime constrains the standard theory of gravity to a trivial vacuum case with R ij = 0 and R = 0 case. Even in modified gravity theories the situation does not improve much, it ends up resulting into vanishing effective pressure and energy density.…”
Section: Projectively Harmonic Spacetimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several articles of this Special Issue are devoted to different problems of classical gravity. An impact of extra symmetries on the exact solutions of general relativity is discussed in [1]. Article [2] considers the problem of universal constants and natural systems of units in the spacetime with an arbitrary number of dimensions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%