2015
DOI: 10.1080/09503153.2015.1087492
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Far Can a Short Leadership and Management Programme Address the Challenges for First Line Social Work Managers? An Evaluation of One of the Skills for Care Leadership and Management Demonstration Sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

3
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our study was designed as evaluation research located in the realist tradition to address what Pawson and Tilley (2004) describe as "the different layers of social reality which make up and surround programmes of change" (p.4). The methods of data collection were deployed in accordance with a tried and tested multi-level, realist evaluation framework (Bailey, 2002(Bailey, , 2007Bailey and Kerlin, 2015;Bailey and Mutale, 2020;Ward and Bailey, 2015) that combines context and input level evaluation proposed by Warr et al (1970) with an evaluation of outcomes (Kirkpatrick, 1994). Table 1 below illustrates the levels of the evaluation, and the mixed-methods approach to data collection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study was designed as evaluation research located in the realist tradition to address what Pawson and Tilley (2004) describe as "the different layers of social reality which make up and surround programmes of change" (p.4). The methods of data collection were deployed in accordance with a tried and tested multi-level, realist evaluation framework (Bailey, 2002(Bailey, , 2007Bailey and Kerlin, 2015;Bailey and Mutale, 2020;Ward and Bailey, 2015) that combines context and input level evaluation proposed by Warr et al (1970) with an evaluation of outcomes (Kirkpatrick, 1994). Table 1 below illustrates the levels of the evaluation, and the mixed-methods approach to data collection.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The framework combined levels developed by Warr et al (1970) [context and inputs] and Kirkpatrick (1994) [outcomes]. By combining these levels and testing them through previous research (Bailey, 2002(Bailey, , 2007Bailey and Littlechild, 2001), the framework has proven suitable for exploring the links between programmes of change and improvement in health and social care outcomes in a range of settings (Bailey & Kerlin, 2012& 2015and Ward & Bailey 2016.…”
Section: Designmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The evaluation design was guided by Pawson and Tilley's [16] realistic evaluation methodology that takes ''heed of the different layers of social reality which make up and surround programmes of change'' (p4). The multi-level evaluation framework [17,18] combined levels from frameworks developed previously by Warr, Bird and Rackham [19] [context and inputs] and Kirkpatrick [20] [outcomes]. By combining these levels from both frameworks and refining these through previous research [21][22][23] this realistic evaluation design supported an in-depth exploration of the rehabilitation services.…”
Section: Evaluation Designmentioning
confidence: 99%