“…Our study was designed as evaluation research located in the realist tradition to address what Pawson and Tilley (2004) describe as "the different layers of social reality which make up and surround programmes of change" (p.4). The methods of data collection were deployed in accordance with a tried and tested multi-level, realist evaluation framework (Bailey, 2002(Bailey, , 2007Bailey and Kerlin, 2015;Bailey and Mutale, 2020;Ward and Bailey, 2015) that combines context and input level evaluation proposed by Warr et al (1970) with an evaluation of outcomes (Kirkpatrick, 1994). Table 1 below illustrates the levels of the evaluation, and the mixed-methods approach to data collection.…”