2009
DOI: 10.1162/rest.91.4.744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Far for a Buck? Tax Differences and the Location of Retail Gasoline Activity in Southeast Chicagoland

Abstract: Abstract-We exploit variation in gasoline and cigarettes taxes in adjacent political jurisdictions for northern Illinois and Indiana to examine consumers' trade-off between prices and travel. We develop a model that relates activity in the retail gasoline industry around the tax borders to consumer locations. Our results indicate that the willingness of a typical Chicagoland consumer to travel an additional mile to buy gasoline corresponds to about $0.065 to $0.084 per gallon. According to our estimates, the o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Manuszak and Moul (2009) analyse for example the retail gasoline activity in Southeast Chicagoland and report a sharp discontinuity in activity across regions that coincides with the political boundary and a decline in activity in the high tax region as the low tax border is approached. Stehr (2007) analyses the effect of Sunday sales bans on spirits and tax variation across U.S. states and reports that about 80% and 20% of increases in spirit sales following the repeal of Sunday sales ban are due to own-state drinking and cross-border shopping, respectively.…”
Section: International Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Manuszak and Moul (2009) analyse for example the retail gasoline activity in Southeast Chicagoland and report a sharp discontinuity in activity across regions that coincides with the political boundary and a decline in activity in the high tax region as the low tax border is approached. Stehr (2007) analyses the effect of Sunday sales bans on spirits and tax variation across U.S. states and reports that about 80% and 20% of increases in spirit sales following the repeal of Sunday sales ban are due to own-state drinking and cross-border shopping, respectively.…”
Section: International Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They suggest that this is not a serious issue as the downward bias of the estimates reflects the constraints placed by entry. 28 This view has an intuitive appeal. However, typically there is no information in this context on the time that it takes for entry to restore a competitive outcome, and therefore an antitrust authority assessing adverse effects to competition within a limited (e.g.…”
Section: Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 For example, the 2000 Competition Commission Supermarket inquiry conducted a price concentration analysis that included dummy variables for different types of stores to capture differences in the product range or other quality measures. 28 The direction and magnitude of the bias depends on its source and generally is not obvious. For example, if it is due to factors affecting marginal costs, then, as an increase in marginal costs shifts up both π(·) and η(·), it could even induce a positive OLS estimate for the coefficient on n in π(·).…”
Section: Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Local residents, tourists or cross-border commuters use existing arbitrage opportunities and buy fuel, tobacco, alcohol or other products in the country where it is cheaper (see e.g. Manuszak and Moul, 2009 for fuel, Thursby, Jensen andThursby, 1991 for tobacco andAsplund, Friberg andWilander, 2007 for alcohol). This is for example also the case for Luxembourg and its neighbouring countries (Mathä, Porpiglia and Ziegelmeyer, 2014a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%