How far is enough? Prediction of the scale of effect for wild bees

Abstract

A crucial issue for landscape ecologists is identifying the spatial extents at which a landscape affects species occurrence. Multi‐scale analyses are usually conducted to identify the ‘scale of effect', that is, the spatial extent associated with the best relationship between landscape variables and species occurrence, which is assumed to be related to species traits. However, few guidelines exist to determine the range of distances to be investigated. Based on the foraging distances of wild bee species, our main goal was to estimate the maximum distance of effect, that is, the distance beyond which the scale of effect for wild bee species is unlikely to be detected. Using the InVEST pollination model, we 1) modelled bee categories with distinct foraging distances and identified the scale of effecton their simulated abundance 2) defined an index, noted λ, that estimates the distance beyond which landscape composition has only negligible effects on simulated abundances. We validated our results by identifying the scale of effecton the abundances of 16 bee species collected in south‐western France. We detected a significant positive relationship between the average foraging distance (α) of the modelled bees and their scale of effect. The λ index was linearly related to the average foraging distances of bees (λ = 5.4α + 253) and was above the identified scale of effect for the modelled bees. The λ was also found to be above the scale of effect for 93% of the observed bee species. Our results suggest that the λ index is a good estimator of the upper limit of the scale of effect for wild bees. The λ index could be used to identify the minimum distance between sampling sites before setting up an experiment and the maximum buffer size required in multi‐scale analysis to detect the scale of effect.

Identifying drivers of sewage-associated pollutants in pollinators across urban landscapes

“…1). Each garden was at least 1 km apart for spatial independence (Bloom et al 2021;Desaegher et al 2022).…”

Wild bee abundance and diversity in an urban landscape: the importance of preserving native vegetation

“…Landscape characteristics were analyzed at a radius of 2.5 km centered on the centroid of the pan-trap triplets (area of 19.63 km 2 or 1963 ha) according to the Local Ecological Planning Program of the Municipality of Querétaro (Municipio de Querétaro 2014). This radius was chosen according to Desaegher et al (2022) who established the minimum distance between sampling sites to avoid spatial pseudo-replication in a wild bee community survey as 5 km. We therefore chose to have a 2.5 km radius around our pan-traps to guarantee the sites independence.…”

Progresses of the international community to understand sunflower–pollinator interactions through multiscale approaches

“…A short distance, below 700 m, between wildflower patches and crop plots has an adverse effect on sunflower yield by competition or density dilution between crop and wild floral resources, which can be more attractive; while it has a facilitation effect on longer distance above 700 m by increasing nesting sites. Wild bees' scale of effect relies on the bee species and vary from 10 m from the nesting site, up to 2550 m (Desaegher et al, 2022).…”