2013
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2278454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Firms Respond to Business Cycles: The Role of Firm Age and Firm Size

Abstract: At least one co-author has disclosed a financial relationship of potential relevance for this research. Further information is available online at http://www.nber.org/papers/w19134.ack NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peerreviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
217
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 147 publications
(232 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
14
217
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, on a more general note, this paper has also highlighted that firms/establishments adjust their labour input in response to a demand shock in numerous ways other than via the number of regular workers. Hence, studies analysing the cyclicality of labour demand at the firm level (e.g., Fort et al, 2013) or the job and worker turnover patterns in response to exchange rate (or other globalization) shocks (e.g., Klein et al, 2003;Moser et al, 2010) most likely underestimate the strength of the employment adjustment if they only focus on the number of regular workers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, on a more general note, this paper has also highlighted that firms/establishments adjust their labour input in response to a demand shock in numerous ways other than via the number of regular workers. Hence, studies analysing the cyclicality of labour demand at the firm level (e.g., Fort et al, 2013) or the job and worker turnover patterns in response to exchange rate (or other globalization) shocks (e.g., Klein et al, 2003;Moser et al, 2010) most likely underestimate the strength of the employment adjustment if they only focus on the number of regular workers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the analysis distinguishes between firm size and age, the results indicate that the greater sensitivity of large firms relative to small firms to cyclical conditions is mainly driven by maturity of firms [9]. In other words, the idea that larger firms are more cyclically sensitive receives greater support when the analysis is restricted to a subset of smaller and older firms, suggesting that smaller and younger firms may be more sensitive than previously thought [8].…”
Section: Job-ladder Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…More recent studies have contributed to this line of research and provided more insights about the issue of firm size and sensitivity to cycles [1], [7], [8], [9], [10]. Importantly, this new wave of studies also provides robust results based on microdata that allow researchers to control for reclassification bias.…”
Section: Job-ladder Mechanismmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We classify a firm as small if its employment at the beginning of the period is less than or equal to l m,t and as large if it is above l m,t . 14 With respect to age, we follow Fort et al (2012) and consider firms aged 5 years or less as young and the rest as old. Lastly, our method of aggregating job flows across firms within each age-size category is similar to that of Davis et al (1998).…”
Section: Classifications and Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%