2015
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/2/625
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How flatbed scanners upset accurate film dosimetry

Abstract: Film is an excellent dosimeter for verification of dose distributions due to its high spatial resolution. Irradiated film can be digitized with low-cost, transmission, flatbed scanners. However, a disadvantage is their lateral scan effect (LSE): a scanner readout change over its lateral scan axis. Although anisotropic light scattering was presented as the origin of the LSE, this paper presents an alternative cause. Hereto, LSE for two flatbed scanners (Epson 1680 Expression Pro and Epson 10000XL), and Gafchrom… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
80
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
80
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A frame, cut out from a transparency sheet was employed to place films in a reproducible and cantered position on the scanner. Whenever there was a gap between the frame and the film pieces along the axis parallel to the lamp, it was closed with idle film pieces in order to minimize the cross‐talk effect . Before acquisitions and after long pauses, five empty scans were taken to stabilize the lamp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A frame, cut out from a transparency sheet was employed to place films in a reproducible and cantered position on the scanner. Whenever there was a gap between the frame and the film pieces along the axis parallel to the lamp, it was closed with idle film pieces in order to minimize the cross‐talk effect . Before acquisitions and after long pauses, five empty scans were taken to stabilize the lamp.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For absolute dose calibration using three colour channels [20], quarters of a film were irradiated in the audit array with 0, 200, 400 and 600 MU (∌0-3.8 Gy) with a 10 × 10 cm 2 field. The films were converted to dose according to the wellestablished local protocol of the VU University Medical Centre (Amsterdam, the Netherlands) [21,22].…”
Section: Measurement Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of them involve only the film: for example, the thickness variations of the active layer 2 , the change in film darkening as a function of post-irradiation time 3 , the influence of humidity and temperature 4,5 , the UV-induced polymerization 6 , etc. Some other uncertainties are a consequence of the interaction of the characteristics of both the film and scanner: for example, the lateral artifact 7,8 , Newton rings 9 , the dependency with the orientation of the film on the scanner bed 10 , the cross talk effect 8 , the dependency on film-to-light source distance 11,12 , etc. Finally, other uncertainties are intrinsic to the scanner: for example, noise 13,14 , the inter-scan variability of the scanner response 11 , warming-up of the lamp 15,16 , differences between color channels 17-20 , etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…GAFChromic EBT3 films were used in this study, in combination with the Epson Expression 10000XL scanner (Seiko Epson Corporation, Nagano, Japan). In the literature, the Epson Expression 10000XL scanner has been selected numerous times 3, 7,8,11,24,25 for radiochromic film dosimetry. In this work, the repeatability of this scanner has been examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%