2018
DOI: 10.1111/eufm.12197
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How friends with money affect corporate cash policies? The international evidence

Abstract: We examine the association between managerial social capital and the cash flow sensitivity of cash in an international setting. We find that social capital reduces the marginal propensity to save cash out of cash flows. This association is stronger for more financially constrained firms, firms with high hedging needs, and firms with more uncertain cash flows. The effect of social capital is partially moderated by the extent of legal protection standards and financial development. We also show that social capit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 121 publications
(291 reference statements)
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We contribute to the existing literature on social networks and corporate and executive outcomes by studying the net economic impact of connectedness on insider trading. Our findings closely relate to the recent studies in corporate finance, which have linked managerial social networks to executive compensation (Engelberg et al, 2012;Horton et al, 2012), access to financing (Engelberg et al, 2012;Ferris et al, 2017b;Javakhadze & Rajkovic, 2018), investment efficiency (El-Khatib et al, 2015), financial development (Javakhadze et al, 2016b), cash-flow sensitivity (Javakhadze et al, 2016a), corporate risk taking (Ferris et al, 2017a), debt contracting (Fogel et al, 2018), and credit ratings (Benson et al, 2018). We extend this literature and show how insider networks influence the trading behavior of insiders and whether such trades have long-term valuation consequences.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…We contribute to the existing literature on social networks and corporate and executive outcomes by studying the net economic impact of connectedness on insider trading. Our findings closely relate to the recent studies in corporate finance, which have linked managerial social networks to executive compensation (Engelberg et al, 2012;Horton et al, 2012), access to financing (Engelberg et al, 2012;Ferris et al, 2017b;Javakhadze & Rajkovic, 2018), investment efficiency (El-Khatib et al, 2015), financial development (Javakhadze et al, 2016b), cash-flow sensitivity (Javakhadze et al, 2016a), corporate risk taking (Ferris et al, 2017a), debt contracting (Fogel et al, 2018), and credit ratings (Benson et al, 2018). We extend this literature and show how insider networks influence the trading behavior of insiders and whether such trades have long-term valuation consequences.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Such networks help them in acquiring not only firm-specific information, but also information and trends on peer companies, industry, and the general economy (Goergen et al, 2019). We argue that as (a) networked insiders have superior channels of information and resource exchange (Fogel et al, 2018;Javakhadze & Rajkovic, 2018), (b) corporate insiders are known to trade in shares of their firms based on their informational advantage (Piotroski & Roulstone, 2005;Seyhun, 1986), and (c) insider trades have long-term valuation consequences for the stock price (Aboody et al, 2005;Ravina & Sapienza, 2010), we expect trades of networked insiders to have higher value-relevant information. We therefore construct our first hypothesis as follows:…”
Section: Network and Insider Tradingmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Therefore, we argue that reverse causality is not a concern for our study.23 Jiang (2017, p. 127) notes that "the magnitude of the IV estimates is, on average, nine times of that of the uninstrumented estimates even when economic insights do not suggest a downward bias of the latter. "24 Contemporary finance literature also uses this method for overcoming measurement error(Javakhadze & Rajkovic, 2019;Lyandres et al, 2019).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%