2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.06.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How gender, age, and geography influence the utilization of radiation therapy in the management of malignant melanoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…It generally develops in the fourth to sixth decades. Its localization depends on gender, and it most commonly develops on the trunk in men and in the lower extremities in women [3]. Contrary to the general localization in men, the current case presented with a lesion on the right half of his face.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…It generally develops in the fourth to sixth decades. Its localization depends on gender, and it most commonly develops on the trunk in men and in the lower extremities in women [3]. Contrary to the general localization in men, the current case presented with a lesion on the right half of his face.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…Other approaches to examining geographical variations have involved an examination of the density of provision within pre-defined health service areas with which to explore the impact of distance; the underlying theory being that the higher the density of facilities/expertise, the lower the distance needed to be travelled to access that service and hence the heavier the demand (see for example (Polsky et al 2006)). The findings of French et al (2006) that referral patterns for radiation therapy for treatment of malignant melanoma show a geographic variation wherein referral rates are lower for those areas that have poorer access to a cancer centre would seem to support such findings although their study also suggested that there was some screening out of those patients who did not require further treatment after diagnosis in areas where there were fewer such centres (i.e. more remote areas).…”
Section: Measures Of Distancementioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the light of concerns related to variations in health inequalities, an increasing number of studies have analysed distance to screening, radiation therapy utilization and other forms of cancer treatment in relation to survival rates (Bentham et al 1995;Hyndman et al 2000;Sheehan et al 2000;Bryant et al 2002;Dejardin et al 2005;French et al 2006;Pagano et al 2007). Variations in access to oncology centres have been studied as a potential explanatory factor for inequalities in patient survival from lung cancer in the South East of England (Jack et al 2003).…”
Section: Health Service Under Considerationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the majority of the studies made some need adjustment, variables used for need adjustment (need factors) vary considerably. For example, in examination of access to radiotherapy based on [37,41,42].…”
Section: Statistical Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%