2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11199-019-01052-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Gender and Race Stereotypes Impact the Advancement of Scholars in STEM: Professors’ Biased Evaluations of Physics and Biology Post-Doctoral Candidates

Abstract: Funding for the present study was provided by the FIU Mine Üçer Women in Science Fund. The authors want to give a special thanks to Hannah Schindler and Natalia Gutierrez who aided in the intensive data collection process for the current study, and Natalia Martinez for her help assembling the final submission.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
180
0
5

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 283 publications
(201 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
(108 reference statements)
5
180
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, a study published last year examined how gender and race influenced faculty perception of postdoctoral candidates in physics and biology at eight US universities by altering the names on otherwise identical CVs 3 . Across departments, faculty members perceived white and Asian candidates to be more competent and hire able than their Black and Latin American counterparts, despite being equally well qualified.…”
Section: Analysing the Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a study published last year examined how gender and race influenced faculty perception of postdoctoral candidates in physics and biology at eight US universities by altering the names on otherwise identical CVs 3 . Across departments, faculty members perceived white and Asian candidates to be more competent and hire able than their Black and Latin American counterparts, despite being equally well qualified.…”
Section: Analysing the Foundationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistically, women and people of color are significantly underrepresented in the field compared to the U.S. and college populations [1,2]. Members of these groups are significantly more likely to encounter external environmental conditions of harassment, bias, and hostile climates [3][4][5][6][7][8] along with internal struggles of stereotype threat, imposter syndrome, a lack of a sense of belonging, and issues around fixed mindset [9][10][11][12]. However, some initiatives have been put in place to address these issues.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Women are stereotyped as being less competent than men in traditionally maledominated occupations, such as those in the fields of science, technology, engineering, and math (STEM; e.g., Smeding 2012). In one experimental study, physics faculty rated a fictional male candidate more competent and more hirable than the female candidate with identical qualifications (Eaton et al 2019).…”
Section: Women Doing Men's Work Hiringmentioning
confidence: 99%