2011
DOI: 10.1080/14608944.2011.629424
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How geography shapesNational Identities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…I know that's been an issue. Some people argue that they should be treated equally, but other people in terms of making some decisions argue, 'Well, you know, it should still carry some weight to have something that's actually out there in paper'" (Kaplan 2008).…”
Section: Future Of Printmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…I know that's been an issue. Some people argue that they should be treated equally, but other people in terms of making some decisions argue, 'Well, you know, it should still carry some weight to have something that's actually out there in paper'" (Kaplan 2008).…”
Section: Future Of Printmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sometimes it just has to do with what my reading is, or how good the arguments are from the different reviewers." Kaplan went on to explain that how thorough and insightful the feedback is from the positive and negative reviewers plays a very large role in his final decisions, and noted that the quality of reviewer's reports varies widely (Kaplan 2008).…”
Section: Peer-review Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It also suggests that hot and banal nationalism are meaningful socio-spatial categories only within a wider matrix of concepts/ discourses and social practices. Mapping and the production of territorial knowledge are key processes in the production of territories and in making them meaningful (Häkli, 2001;Kaplan & Herb, 2011;Murphy, 2013;Paasi, 1996;Zeigler, 2002). Nationality and citizenship, for their part, are crucial mediating formal and emotional categories that bring together the state, territory, forms of nationalism and independence (cf.…”
Section: A Relational Perspective On Independence and Spatial Socialimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the homogenization perspective, the individual subject appears as a member of a cohesive whole, that is, a culture that is represented by traditional and ethnic values, language and politics (Craig and Douglas, 2006). From this viewpoint, people share a 'national identity' as a form of awareness of shared ethnicity and history (Kaplan and Herb, 2011;Smith, 1991: 22-23) and build their individual identity based on locally anchored feelings of community, loyalty and devotion (Izberk-Bilgin, 2012; Mehta and Belk, 1991; see also Bardhi et al, 2012 for a critique). CCT scholars who adopt this perspective argue that consumption of local brands becomes a way for consumers to preserve their ethnic values and cultures.…”
Section: Idea Of Global Mcdonalization Ormentioning
confidence: 99%