2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.joi.2014.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How good is a model based on bibliometric indicators in predicting the final decisions made by peers?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Through the experiments conducted, the operator's effectiveness was tested using various index combinations and concluded that a distinguishable skyline set can be produced for different time periods, disciplines and combinations of indices. Efforts to distinguish scientists from a large set of scientometric data have been made before either using a geometric combination of indices (Revesz, 2014), adding the element of time in the scientometric indicators (Wolcott et al, 2015) or utilizing probability models (Vieira, Cabral, & Gomes, 2014). However, these models often present limitations, meaning they cannot be automatically applied to a variety of datasets under a customizable number of criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through the experiments conducted, the operator's effectiveness was tested using various index combinations and concluded that a distinguishable skyline set can be produced for different time periods, disciplines and combinations of indices. Efforts to distinguish scientists from a large set of scientometric data have been made before either using a geometric combination of indices (Revesz, 2014), adding the element of time in the scientometric indicators (Wolcott et al, 2015) or utilizing probability models (Vieira, Cabral, & Gomes, 2014). However, these models often present limitations, meaning they cannot be automatically applied to a variety of datasets under a customizable number of criteria.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brzezinski (2014), evaluó en la distribución de las citas la "ley de potencia" (power-law behaviour) y encontró que su aplicación es adecuada para los trabajos más citados en Física y Astronomía, pero no para el resto de áreas. Vieira, Cabral & Gomes (2014) analizaron el poder predictivo de los indicadores bibliométricos frente a los resultados de las evaluaciones por pares y la obtención de los niveles académicos de profesor Asociado y Catedrático en universidades portuguesas.…”
Section: Los Estudios Bibliométricos Recientesunclassified
“…Brzezinski (2014), evaluó en la distribución de las citas la "ley de potencia" (power-law behaviour) y encontró que su aplicación es adecuada para los trabajos más citados en Física y Astronomía, pero no para el resto de áreas. Vieira, Cabral & Gomes (2014) analizaron el poder predictivo de los indicadores bibliométricos frente a los resultados de las evaluaciones por pares y la obtención de los niveles académicos de profesor Asociado y Catedrático en universidades portuguesas. Una tercera manera de clasificar los trabajos recientes son aquellos que critican las métricas actuales.…”
Section: Conclusionesunclassified