2005
DOI: 10.1029/2004ja010799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How good is the relationship of solar and interplanetary plasma parameters with geomagnetic storms?

Abstract: [1] Since the work of Snyder et al. (1963), who showed a possible link between interplanetary solar wind speed V and geomagnetic index Kp, such a relationship has been examined by many workers and found to be rather loose. In the present communication this relationship is rechecked for all data during . It was noted that moderate or strong geomagnetic storms occurred only when solar wind speed V was above $350 km/s. However, above this limit, the plots of Dst versus V showed a large scatter, and any value of V… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
41
1
6

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
7
41
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Peaks shorter than 1 yr may be due to seasonal climatic phenomena. The ∼2 yrs period can be associated with the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO) in the stratosphere (Holton et al 1972;Dunkerton 1997;Baldwin et al 2001;Naujokat 1986;Holton et al 1980) and with the solar activity (Kane, 2005).The periodicities ∼3 and 4 yrs could be related to the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) (Nuzhdina 2002;Njau 2006: Enfield 1992) that is a large-scale climatic phenomenon. The periodicities ∼5 yrs can be a harmonic of the 11-yrs solar cycle (Djurović & Páquet 1996).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peaks shorter than 1 yr may be due to seasonal climatic phenomena. The ∼2 yrs period can be associated with the Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO) in the stratosphere (Holton et al 1972;Dunkerton 1997;Baldwin et al 2001;Naujokat 1986;Holton et al 1980) and with the solar activity (Kane, 2005).The periodicities ∼3 and 4 yrs could be related to the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) (Nuzhdina 2002;Njau 2006: Enfield 1992) that is a large-scale climatic phenomenon. The periodicities ∼5 yrs can be a harmonic of the 11-yrs solar cycle (Djurović & Páquet 1996).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subcycles with periods of 152-158 days were also noted from flare rates (Ballester et al 2004) or other solar indices (Kane 2005c). Such subcyles are also called Rieger periodicities and were even discovered on stars, e.g., with a 294-day cycle on UX Arietis, believed to be caused by equatorially trapped Rossbytype waves modulating the emergence of magnetic flux at the surface (Massi et al 2005).…”
Section: Sunspot Predictionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, a cycle is not simple in nonlinear dynamics; fluctuations in the Babcock-Leighton dynamo were actually shown to lead to period doubling and to transition to chaos (Charbonneau et al 2005b), possibly explaining the anomaly of the Maunder minimum (Charbonneau 2004(Charbonneau , 2005Charbonneau et al 2004). Spherical harmonic decomposition of magnetic field data revealed also intermittent oscillations with periods of 2.1-2.5 yr, 1.5-1.8 yr, and 1.2-1.4 yr (Knaack & Stenflo 2005;Kane 2005b), as similarly found in cosmic-ray modulations (Starodubtsev et al 2004). While we believed that the magnetic cycle of 22 years (Hale cycle) clocks everything on the Sun, correlations with the equatorial rotation rate actually reveal that the phase of the beginning of a 22 yr cycle in the latitudinal gradients is out of phase by 180Њ (Javaraiah et al 2005).…”
Section: More Puzzles About the Solar Dynamomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this reference, we have considered different places on earth as well as storms of different intensities to know the nature of variation and amount of decrease at different places during different storms. Some studies have been conducted in the past to investigate how the variations in IMF during geomagnetic storm events cause the variations in the geomagnetic field like a cause-effect relationship [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%