Digital Environments 2017
DOI: 10.14361/9783839434970-010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Has Social Media Changed the Way We Grieve?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Broadly speaking, the privacy paradox describes how quite often people's intentions concerning privacy do not align with their behaviour (Kokolakis 2017;Kasket 2019). Previous research revealed that some Facebook users were critical of sharing grief online, certain that it was attention-seeking (Lapper 2017), which correlates with Spyros Kokolakis's (2017: 1) research on the phenomenon: 'individuals reveal personal information for relatively small rewards, often just for drawing the attention of peers in an online social network.' However, my previous research (2017) simultaneously revealed that several participants found sharing grief online to be a comfortable outlet as it helped elicit consoling responses and share memories of a late individual, as can also be seen here.…”
Section: Public Vs Privatementioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Broadly speaking, the privacy paradox describes how quite often people's intentions concerning privacy do not align with their behaviour (Kokolakis 2017;Kasket 2019). Previous research revealed that some Facebook users were critical of sharing grief online, certain that it was attention-seeking (Lapper 2017), which correlates with Spyros Kokolakis's (2017: 1) research on the phenomenon: 'individuals reveal personal information for relatively small rewards, often just for drawing the attention of peers in an online social network.' However, my previous research (2017) simultaneously revealed that several participants found sharing grief online to be a comfortable outlet as it helped elicit consoling responses and share memories of a late individual, as can also be seen here.…”
Section: Public Vs Privatementioning
confidence: 84%
“…Death is social (Walter et al 2011); thus, much research has focused on the communication of a death online across various platforms, from blogs and social media sites (DeGroot and Carmack 2012;Brubaker, Hayes and Dourish 2013) to dedicated grief forums (Hastings, Musambira and Hoover 2007) and the discussion on parasocial grieving as mentioned previously. There is no doubt that online environments afford new possibilities for managing grief (Kasket 2019), and my previous research with England-based Facebook users found that the technological shield offered by social media helps people grieve online in ways they would not face-to-face, masking our vulnerability (Lapper 2017). Online memorials allow the bereaved to continue their interactions with the dead (Refslund Christensen and Gotved 2015), leading to what has been coined continuing bonds (Klass, Silverman and Nickman 1996).…”
Section: Scholarshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Social Media sites used by the people for happiness whenever they are in the public for that they made private conversation throughout Facebook and WhatsApp [9]. There are no restrictions were imposed on social media activity all the people are using social sites i.e., students, teachers, family members irrespective of their gender and community and religion [10]. The pluralistic public spheres that emerged within the arena of social media [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%