2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2021.124437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How hydrogen bonds influence the slow crack growth resistance of polyamide 12

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This ability to resist autoclaving should be associated with the establishment of the noncovalent secondary interactions (hydrogen bonds) between the PVA and PBO chains. A similar phenomenon is known in nylon (polyamide), [ 97,98 ] where the presence of secondary hydrogen bonds between the amide groups of the molecular chains is responsible for the higher chemical, mechanical and thermal resistance of the material. Regarding FTIR, the spectra revealed minor variations in the intensity of the peaks corresponding to the PVA segments (see Section 2.2) in 6P1Z_AUT (Figure S3a, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…This ability to resist autoclaving should be associated with the establishment of the noncovalent secondary interactions (hydrogen bonds) between the PVA and PBO chains. A similar phenomenon is known in nylon (polyamide), [ 97,98 ] where the presence of secondary hydrogen bonds between the amide groups of the molecular chains is responsible for the higher chemical, mechanical and thermal resistance of the material. Regarding FTIR, the spectra revealed minor variations in the intensity of the peaks corresponding to the PVA segments (see Section 2.2) in 6P1Z_AUT (Figure S3a, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Subsequently, a cycle of reformation and rupture of H-bonds due to continuing plastic deformation occurs until the sample fails. The excess work done to overcome the constraints on molecular motion imposed by, and the repeated deformation of the dynamically cross-linking H-bonds results in the observed increase in toughness. Strain hardening response ( E H ) associated with the dynamical reformation of H-bonds during the plastic deformation process is expected to increase σ f . It is important to realize that failure strength would increase even with little to no improvement in strain hardening due to H-bonding, because of the previously observed monotonic increase in yield strength; the intrinsic strain hardening mechanisms of the polymer will ensure an increase in failure strength (beyond yield stress, i.e., σ f ≥ σ y for E H ≥ 0) as long as the fibers are not brittle.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failure strain ( ε f ) increases as the H‐bond induced crosslinking sites create load‐bearing segments between them, even as the segments between physical crosslinks are broken. [ 43 ] Increases in E H and ε f lead to increased failure strength ( σ f ), while the additional energy dissipated during the post‐yield regime to constantly disrupt the dynamically reforming H‐bonds should manifest as increased toughness ( U T ). This is indeed observed from Figure 4a–d, wherein, E H , σ f , ε f , and U T increase up to 10 wt.% of TA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%