2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.jce.2003.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How important is ownership in a market with level playing field?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
73
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
5
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, most of the studies are based on the early phase of liberalization. Bhaumik and Dimova (2004) however find that the results are different depending on time period studied. They find that private-sector and foreign banks were more efficient than public-sector banks initially, but after 1998-1999, neither ownership nor competition affects bank performance.…”
Section: Background and Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, most of the studies are based on the early phase of liberalization. Bhaumik and Dimova (2004) however find that the results are different depending on time period studied. They find that private-sector and foreign banks were more efficient than public-sector banks initially, but after 1998-1999, neither ownership nor competition affects bank performance.…”
Section: Background and Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 78%
“…Bank performance is typically measured by return on assets (Berger and Mester, 2003;Bhaumik and Dimova, 2004;DeYoung et al,1993;Hirschey,1999;Nippani and Green, 2002). However, this may not be the best measure of efficiency in an expanding sector where profitability may increase simply because of a combination of increasing output prices and stable input costs, without any underlying efficiency gain.…”
Section: Background and Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the empirical literature it is customary to control for these factors to avoid any spurious relation between the dependent variable and the variables of interest. Following existing literature (Berger et al 2010;Liang et al 2013;Faleye and Krishnan 2017) and the unique regulatory requirements of bank lending in India (Sarkar et al 1998;Bhaumik and Dimova 2004;Yang and Zhao 2014), we use a number of conditioning variables in our regression. These variables include (i) Log Assets, measured by the logarithm of total assets, to proxy for bank's market power and other lending characteristics; (ii) Loans to Assets, measured by the percentage of loans and advances to total assets, to account for possible differences in business models across banks and (ii) Priority Sector Lending, measured by the percentage of priority sector lending to total loans and advances, to proxy for the extent of government intervention in bank lending with potential effects on bank outcomes.…”
Section: Control Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In India we have banks of public sector banks, private sector banks and foreign banks. In India after 1992, all the three categories of banks are subjected to same prudential and regulatory norms and therefore a level playing field was created (Bhaumik and Dimova, 2003). Bhaumik and Dimova (2003), found that public sector banks performance is in no way inferior to the private sector banks.…”
Section: Macroeconomic and Bank Specific Determinants Of Npasmentioning
confidence: 99%