2016
DOI: 10.1002/chem.201504804
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Interfaces Affect the Acidity of the Anilinium Ion

Abstract: The acidity of a compound is a fundamental property that dictates molecular speciation and reactivity in solution. Measurements of acidity of simple molecules in interfacial environments are rarely carried out but assumptions often are made that the difference is sufficiently small that the change can be ignored. The effect of oil-surfactant-water interfaces in reverse micellar systems on the pKa value of the anilinium ion was measured using titrations by NMR spectroscopy as the size of the bis(2-ethylhexyl)su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The resulting pK a values calculated in this work are summarized in Table 2 for all the systems investigated in this work and detailed in the descriptions below. Our hypothesis that G is likely positioned such that the N-terminus is near or in the interstitial water region of the RM either facing the negatively charged interface or actually associated with the interface is in line with previous observations and predictions with other charged molecules [51,52]. This pattern was observed for all the G peptides to different degrees, with the largest change for G. The larger difference for G can be explained because this is a smaller amphiphilic molecule, and penetration of the interface by the N-terminus will impact the amphiphilic molecule more than with peptides.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The resulting pK a values calculated in this work are summarized in Table 2 for all the systems investigated in this work and detailed in the descriptions below. Our hypothesis that G is likely positioned such that the N-terminus is near or in the interstitial water region of the RM either facing the negatively charged interface or actually associated with the interface is in line with previous observations and predictions with other charged molecules [51,52]. This pattern was observed for all the G peptides to different degrees, with the largest change for G. The larger difference for G can be explained because this is a smaller amphiphilic molecule, and penetration of the interface by the N-terminus will impact the amphiphilic molecule more than with peptides.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The smallest G, which is a zwitterion at neutral pH, is likely to interact more strongly with the interface based on the large changes in the pK a of the free amine part of the peptide. As we demonstrated with aniline, the observed differences are likely to be caused by changes in location and not due to an inherent difference in pK a values in the new environment [52]. This may also be due to the disruption of the favorable five-membered ring that is formed by the positively charged protons on the amine and the negatively charged oxygen on the carboxylate group in water by the presence of Na + at the RM interface, as mentioned previously.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Molecular information on the specific interaction and placement of the compounds with respect to a membrane interface was sought using AOT RMs and NMR spectroscopy. , , To this end, the 1 H NMR spectrum of each N-containing compound was acquired in D 2 O and varying sizes of RM. By varying the sizes of the RM ( w 0 ), small changes in the RM microenvironment occur.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first model membrane, Langmuir monolayer, has been used to obtain free energies of mixing of hydrophobic molecules, explore phenomena within the membrane, and to test how molecules affect a lipid interface. While compressing a phospholipid Langmuir monolayer in the presence of the molecules shown in Figure , it is possible to determine if the molecules expand, reorganize, or affect the compressibility of the phospholipid monolayer . A commonly used phospholipid, dipalmitoylphosphatidylcholine (DPPC), can comprise up to 40% of lung phospholipid content because of its superior ability to expand and spread at the lung alveolar air–liquid interface. Similarly, dipalmitoylphosphatidylethanolamine (DPPE) is utilized to model the inner leaflet of bacterial and eukaryotic membranes for drug and lipid interactions. , These two lipids have become a very appealing model interface to study drug and lipid interactions and therefore were used in this study as a model membrane interface to study the interactions of the N-containing compounds in Figure . To determine the molecular details of interactions of small aromatic N-containing compounds with an interface, their interactions with aerosol-OT (AOT) reverse micelles (RMs) were examined. , RMs are self-assembled microemulsions that form at low water concentration. In these systems, the placement and orientation could be identified by monitoring interactions with the AOT headgroup and/or lipid tails using one-dimensional (1D) and two-dimensional (2D) NMR spectroscopic techniques. , With the combination of these two model membrane systems (Figure ), information about how the compounds in Figure interact with membrane-like interfaces was obtained in this study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In conclusion, these types of studies are important for investigation of reactions in RMs. Specifically, protonation reactions [ 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 ], nucleophilic substitution reactions [ 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 ], electron transfer reactions [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 ], and enzymatic reactions [ 65 , 66 , 67 ] have been investigated and are known to be affected by the inhomogeneous environment such as those found in microemulsions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%