How Internet Users Find, Evaluate, and Use Online Health Information: A Cross-Cultural Review

Abstract

The Internet has become a favored source to find health information. Worldwide, about 4.5% of all Internet searches are for health-related information. However, research has found that the quality of online health information is mixed, which raises serious concerns about the impact of this information. This paper reviews relevant research to understand how health information on the Internet is retrieved, evaluated, and used. Most users of online health information are looking for information about specific health conditions because they or someone they know was diagnosed with a medical condition. They typically use general search engines to find online health information and enter short phrases, often misspelled. They seldom go beyond the first page of a search. Both their search and evaluation skills are limited although they are concerned about the quality of online health information. They avoid sites with overt commercialism, but often do not pay attention to indicators of credibility. Online health information is used to fill an information void which can enhance coping and self efficacy, affects health-related decisions and behavior of users and their friends and family, and is often discussed with health care providers. There are cross-cultural differences in the types of sites used as well as how online information is used. Based on the research reviewed in this paper, three major recommendations are suggested. Professionals should recommend sites. Professionals should promote more effective search and evaluation techniques. Professionals should be involved in developing and promoting uniform standards for health and mental health sites.

Stories of Hell and Healing: Internet Users’ Construction of Benzodiazepine Distress and Withdrawal

“…Their relationship with the mainstream medical establishment is complex as some forums and blogs offer information which could be viewed as inaccurate, risky or subversive (Gavin, Rodham, & Poyer, 2008;Mo & Coulson, 2014). The reliability of YouTube as an information source been questioned (Morahan-Martin, 2004) and some of the videos on benzodiazepine withdrawal are particularly disturbing and frightening 1 2 , 23 Our study indicates that during and after benzodiazepine withdrawal, people turn to forums and seek reassurance, advice and support from other users, sometimes in a state of extreme distress and anxiety. Becoming dependent on benzodiazepines can impact significantly on a persons' life, including distorting the persons' view of themselves.…”

The Impact of Medical Terminology in Self-Triage Decision-Making

“…This study focused on the terminology seen in the context of fictional self-triage decisions, the role of uncertainty in light of different self-posited diagnoses is particularly important given our technologically and informationally rich environment, where individuals seek much of their health information online. With individuals reporting self-triage as one of the primary reasons for online health information seeking (Bowes et al, 2012), decisions to seek care are now influenced by publically available information, most of which is found on the Internet (Morahan-Martin, 2004). More specifically, searching for health information may actually escalate health concerns (White and Horvitz, 2009;Fergus, 2013) and health information "facts" are often hard to find and are rarely contained within the same information site (Benigeri and Pluye, 2003).…”

Promoting the use of health information and communication technologies in Spain: a new approach based on the ICT-H

“…Additionally, patients' requests would be more efficient. Thus, health professionals must act in three main ways (Morahan-Martin, 2004): (i) they should recommend sites, (ii) they should promote more effective search and evaluation techniques, (iii) they should be involved in developing and promoting uniform standards for health sites.…”