2021
DOI: 10.1037/dev0001201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How is the hypothesis space represented? Evidence from young children’s active search and predictions in a multiple-cue inference task.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, children may have motivations independent of the objectives of the task, such as socially engaging with the experimenter (Jaswal & Kondrad, 2016). How children represent their environment and understand experimental tasks, and the extent to which this diverges from researchers' assumptions, may be influenced directly or indirectly by multiple factors, including age (Jones et al., 2021); learning experiences; and interindividual differences in cognition or cultural, racial, and socioeconomic background. As a result, researchers can observe seemingly inefficient behaviors, despite the fact that children apply broadly efficient (or at least meaningful) strategies, when there is a mismatch between children's assumptions and the ground truth about the identity of the potential hypotheses and their relative likelihood.…”
Section: Missing Pieces In the Active‐learning Puzzlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, children may have motivations independent of the objectives of the task, such as socially engaging with the experimenter (Jaswal & Kondrad, 2016). How children represent their environment and understand experimental tasks, and the extent to which this diverges from researchers' assumptions, may be influenced directly or indirectly by multiple factors, including age (Jones et al., 2021); learning experiences; and interindividual differences in cognition or cultural, racial, and socioeconomic background. As a result, researchers can observe seemingly inefficient behaviors, despite the fact that children apply broadly efficient (or at least meaningful) strategies, when there is a mismatch between children's assumptions and the ground truth about the identity of the potential hypotheses and their relative likelihood.…”
Section: Missing Pieces In the Active‐learning Puzzlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Younger children tend to search more exhaustively and less systematically than older children, and have difficulty identifying and attending to the most relevant information (Betsch et al, 2016;Davidson, 1991aDavidson, ,1991bDavidson, , 1996. They also have difficulty reasoning about more than one hypothesis at a time and tend to ask about one item at a time in question-asking games, possibly because they struggle to reason about task-relevant information in a hierarchical, abstract manner (Bramley et al, 2022;Jones et al, 2021;Ruggeri & Feufel, 2015;Ruggeri et al, 2021).…”
Section: The Development Of Active Learning Strategies and Memory In ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, children may ask a question intended to confirm or rule out a hypothesis that they believe is more likely than others, even though the researchers assume that all the considered hypotheses should be considered equally likely (see Bramley et al, 2022;Ruggeri & Lombrozo, 2015). Also, compared with adults, children may have altogether different ways to represent the presented stimuli (see Jones et al, 2021), and how the stimuli are represented may even differ across children.…”
Section: A More Pessimistic Perspective On Children's Early Active-le...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, research on ecological active learning has focused on identifying key developmental differences in the efficiency and adaptiveness of children's search, highlighting three important sources of developmental change: an increasing ability to recognize and exploit the abstract, hierarchical structure of the hypothesis space ( Jones et al, 2021), increasingly sophisticated verbal abilities and vocabulary (Ruggeri & Feufel, 2015), and a growing ability to implement efficient rules to decide when to stop searching for more information (Ruggeri et al, 2016). However, it is not yet known why these changes occur, or what task-related, cultural, environmental, or individual factors (e.g., differences in cognitive abilities, vocabulary, motivation, personality, education, parenting style) drive developmental changes in active learning, how these factors interact with each other, or how their relative importance changes with age.…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%