2004
DOI: 10.1177/154193120404800615
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Knowledgeable are Salespeople About the Usability of Their Merchandise?

Abstract: Salespeople (selling dryers, cell phones, recliners, or jewelry) in 25 stores were asked to recommend products they believed to be easy to use. They were also asked which products or features were most likely to be helpful to customers with specific physical, cognitive, or sensory limitations. There was little consensus across salespeople selling the same product. There were surprising omissions and some examples of incorrect claims. Further, salespeople largely ignored (or were unaware of) design features tha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Replicating the findings of Carswell et al (2004), we found that salespeople made more claims per interview about nonspecific aspects of usability (M = .95) and those that focused on physical strength and mobility limitations (M = 1.14) compared to the number of claims made regarding sensory (M = .32) and cognitive (M = .23) issues (F(3,186}= 12.61, p < .0001, Tukey-Kramer p < .01). Follow-up analyses revealed that the importance of sensory information varied as a function of product class, with sensory information gaining in importance when salespeople talked about the usability of cell phones.…”
Section: When Asked To Explain Their Recommendations What Types Of Umentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Replicating the findings of Carswell et al (2004), we found that salespeople made more claims per interview about nonspecific aspects of usability (M = .95) and those that focused on physical strength and mobility limitations (M = 1.14) compared to the number of claims made regarding sensory (M = .32) and cognitive (M = .23) issues (F(3,186}= 12.61, p < .0001, Tukey-Kramer p < .01). Follow-up analyses revealed that the importance of sensory information varied as a function of product class, with sensory information gaining in importance when salespeople talked about the usability of cell phones.…”
Section: When Asked To Explain Their Recommendations What Types Of Umentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Following the procedures of Carswell et al (2004), we focused our questions on the usability of four product classes -recliners, dryers, jewelry, and cell phones. These products were chosen to include products that required relatively gross movement for control (i.e., recliners and dryers) and others that required predominantly fine movement (i.e., cell phones and jewelry).…”
Section: Productsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Second, the contribution of usability engineering to the commercial success of consumer products is to some degree dependent on the usability perceptions of shoppers. In a recent study, we found that the usability advice of salespeople provided little guidance for shoppers (Carswell, Lio, & McNally, 2004). Thus, consumers of any age who want an easy-to-use product may need to rely on their own usability judgments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%