2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2004.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How large is large enough for insects? Forest fragmentation effects at three spatial scales

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
36
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Ribas et al (2005) observed that the total number of species in many small remnants (varying from 3.21 ha to 5.56 ha) was not significantly different from the species number in a large remnant (30.13 ha). Results were different for crickets, which had higher species richness in smaller remnants (Ribas et al 2005). These results show that area and habitat fragmentation effects could indeed be observed in different scales Loyola & Martins 2008), and that different taxonomic groups can show diverse responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ribas et al (2005) observed that the total number of species in many small remnants (varying from 3.21 ha to 5.56 ha) was not significantly different from the species number in a large remnant (30.13 ha). Results were different for crickets, which had higher species richness in smaller remnants (Ribas et al 2005). These results show that area and habitat fragmentation effects could indeed be observed in different scales Loyola & Martins 2008), and that different taxonomic groups can show diverse responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…In Central Amazon, bee species richness increased with area size, even in remnants smaller than 40 ha (Morato & Campos 2000). Ribas et al (2005) observed that the total number of species in many small remnants (varying from 3.21 ha to 5.56 ha) was not significantly different from the species number in a large remnant (30.13 ha). Results were different for crickets, which had higher species richness in smaller remnants (Ribas et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…São ainda utilizados para comportamento territorial e reprodutivo (bateman & FerGuson 2004) e também da ecologia (sPerber et al 2003;ribas et al 2005).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…An increase in the abundance of herbivores at disturbed sites may be attributed to increased primary production caused by light conditions in tree-fall gaps, although decreases in herbivore abundance have been reported under severe disturbance (Schowalter and Ganio 1999). Decreased carnivore abundance in disturbed canopy and floor communities may reflect their low migration ability (Ribas et al 2005). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%