“…Sometimes, structure-based pK a prediction tools, such as the empirical method Propka 3 and the Poisson-Boltzmann solver based methods APBS-PDB2PQR, 4 H++, 5 and DelPhiPKa, 6 are used to obtain estimates of the protonation states prior to running simulations; however, these tools do not directly account for the dynamic flexibility of the protein, which may lead to incorrect assignment of protonation states. Most importantly, even if the initial assignment is correct, protonation states may change in the course of conformational dynamics, as demonstrated in pH-dependent protein folding, 7,8 protein-ligand binding, [9][10][11] enzyme catalysis, 12 and ion/substrate transport across the membrane. 13,14 One solution to the above problems is to use constant pH molecular dynamics (CpHMD) methods to determine protonation states on the fly during the MD simulation.…”