How Livelihood Assets Contribute to Sustainable Development of Smallholder Farmers

Abstract

There is a knowledge gap and practical demand to understand the relationship between capitals for developing sustainable livelihoods to realize poverty reduction and sustainable development, in particular for the smallholder farmers. This paper intends to make sights into an important livelihood challenge faced by smallholder farmers, which also aims to find out strategy (ies) in accelerating smallholder farmers' poverty reduction and achieving sustainable development. More specifically, we used a hybrid approach by adopting both qualitative and quantitative methods along with the concept of sustainable livelihood approach to reveal six capitals of farmers' household capacity and their potential relationships. Based on an analysis of Grounded Theory for smallholder farmers, we proposed a newly built framework for smallholder farmers' sustainable livelihoods by taking the Psychological capital (Psycap) into the sustainable livelihoods' assets. With a total sample of 796 households representing 26 counties in Three Gorges Reservoir Region (TGRR) in China, we adopted the Structural Equation Modelling using partial least squares (PLS‐SEM) to explore the key factors and key paths affecting smallholder farmers' sustainable livelihoods. Results indicate that Psycap can effectively promote the performance of Human capital (Humcap) and Physical capital (Phycap), with both significant direct and significant indirect effects on sustainable livelihoods; Phycap and Humcap have significant impacts on the new sustainable livelihood index. Finally, this paper proposed corresponding policy recommendations for poverty alleviation and sustainable livelihoods of smallholder farmers. © 2020 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Is Bhasan Char Island, Noakhali district in Bangladesh a sustainable place for the relocated Rohingya displaced people? An empirical study

“…In a broader perspective, livelihood is connected with three interlinking aspects, such as assets, context, and strategies. Assets enable people to pursue their goals and reduce poverty (Li et al 2020 ). Context, such as economic trends, and different types of shocks and seasonal influences (availability and scarcity), also determine people’s livelihood.…”

Towards poor‐centred value chain for sustainable development: A conceptual framework

“…• Access control: Actions to develop capital and ability for approaching access, including investing and working on education, understanding broader world-view about market, developing professional networks and participating in the value chains' activities • Gaining access: Action reacting to opportunities, barriers and market forces for pursuing livelihood activities and interacting with market and public actors • Access maintenance: Actions to keep resources' and benefits' flows, including maintaining interactions with market and public actors, managing expenditures and savings for further investment, overcoming socio-cultural norms and enhancing returns to endowment Livelihood • Activities: Agricultural activities and non-agricultural activities • Strategy: Accumulation strategies to increase income and assets, adaptive strategies for risk-spreading, coping strategies to minimise impacts of livelihood shocks, survival strategies to prevent destitution and death and competing strategies for jobs and markets • Outcomes as livelihood strategies' achievements/outputs: Livelihood security with improved food security and well-being and reduced vulnerability, sustainable livelihood with resilient coping with locally immediate climatic, economic and market shocks and resource use Source: Chambers and Conway (1992); Ellis (2000); Narayan and Cassidy (2000); Hulme and Shepherd (2003); Laderchi et al (2003); Shaffer (2008); Scoones (2009); Fowler and Brand (2011);Feliciano (2019); Li et al (2020).…”

Smallholder rubber agroforestry farming in the non-traditional areas of Sri Lanka: An application of assets-based livelihood capital indicator approach

“…The authors also highlighted that most diversified rubber practice involves higher livelihood capitals [12]. The use of livelihood capitals to analyse the existing status of smallholder farming was reported in various studies including the decision on planting [13], livelihood assets on sustainable development [14] livelihood assets on food security [15].…”