2022
DOI: 10.1177/23259671221070857
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Long Does It Take to Achieve Clinically Significant Outcomes After Isolated Biceps Tenodesis?

Abstract: Background: Clinically significant outcomes (CSOs) connect patient-reported outcome measures data to patient-perceived benefit. Although investigators have established threshold values for various CSOs, the timeline to achieve these outcomes after isolated biceps tenodesis (BT) has yet to be defined. Purpose: To define the time-dependent nature of minimal clinically important difference (MCID), substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) achievement after isolated BT. Study … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It represents the smallest difference in a patient's outcome that is clinically meaningful, or the smallest amount of change that is noticeable and significant to the patient. 23 Using MCID is essential for outcomes-based research, as a statistical improvement in a numerical PROMIS score may not necessarily represent a true clinical improvement. The MCID was determined via half of a standard deviation of a given PROMIS value, consistent with the current orthopaedic literature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It represents the smallest difference in a patient's outcome that is clinically meaningful, or the smallest amount of change that is noticeable and significant to the patient. 23 Using MCID is essential for outcomes-based research, as a statistical improvement in a numerical PROMIS score may not necessarily represent a true clinical improvement. The MCID was determined via half of a standard deviation of a given PROMIS value, consistent with the current orthopaedic literature.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%