2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2004.05.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How long is too long: Does a prolonged second stage of labor in nulliparous women affect maternal and neonatal outcomes?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

16
203
2
10

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 272 publications
(231 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
16
203
2
10
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2 Recently, some authors have extended the duration of the second stage to three hours because most nulliparous women who underwent regional anaesthesia were found to deliver within three hours of second-stage labour in comparison to two hours in those without regional analgesia. 3,4 More importantly, the extension of time given to the second stage of labour has been shown to increase the overall rate of vaginal births without adversely affecting neonatal morbidity. 3,4 However, maternal morbidities are increased and include operative vaginal delivery, anal sphincter tears, postpartum haemorrhage and emergency Caesarean sections (CSs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…1,2 Recently, some authors have extended the duration of the second stage to three hours because most nulliparous women who underwent regional anaesthesia were found to deliver within three hours of second-stage labour in comparison to two hours in those without regional analgesia. 3,4 More importantly, the extension of time given to the second stage of labour has been shown to increase the overall rate of vaginal births without adversely affecting neonatal morbidity. 3,4 However, maternal morbidities are increased and include operative vaginal delivery, anal sphincter tears, postpartum haemorrhage and emergency Caesarean sections (CSs).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 More importantly, the extension of time given to the second stage of labour has been shown to increase the overall rate of vaginal births without adversely affecting neonatal morbidity. 3,4 However, maternal morbidities are increased and include operative vaginal delivery, anal sphincter tears, postpartum haemorrhage and emergency Caesarean sections (CSs). [5][6][7][8] Furthermore, the rates of CS have risen steadily in the past two decades and may be associated with a disproportionate rise in second-stage CS due to a decline in the use of instrumental deliveries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many authors report that a prolonged second stage is associated with maternal complications, especially postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) related to uterine atony (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7). They studied the second stage of labour, beginning at full dilatation and finishing at birth, as an only one continuous phase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Caesarean section for labour dystocia can be reduced by defining arrest after 4 hours of no cervical change. [12][13][14][15] A Partogram can be used to identify labour abnormalities. Similarly other secondary drivers for each primary driver are identified which are the areas of intervention or change.…”
Section: Secondary Driversmentioning
confidence: 99%