2012
DOI: 10.17310/ntj.2012.4.02
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Marginal Tax Rates Affect Families at Various Levels of Poverty

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the United States, there is heterogeneity in the shapes of the effective tax rates as a function of income as they vary by state, family status, age, type of residence, etc. Some typical patterns of the effective marginal rates in the US data are progressive, U-shaped, and inverted S-shaped (see Congressional Budget Office 2007 and Maag et al 2012). 15 Kelly's skewness is defined as…”
Section: Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the United States, there is heterogeneity in the shapes of the effective tax rates as a function of income as they vary by state, family status, age, type of residence, etc. Some typical patterns of the effective marginal rates in the US data are progressive, U-shaped, and inverted S-shaped (see Congressional Budget Office 2007 and Maag et al 2012). 15 Kelly's skewness is defined as…”
Section: Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 See, for example, Maag et al (2012). 9 Using simulated data has a number of advantages relative to using observed panel data.…”
Section: Measuring Work Incentives Using a Structural Dynamic Model mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 See, for example, Congressional Budget Office (2015). 7 See, for example, Maag et al (2012). 8 Evans and co-authors also focus on how the usual annual adjustment for price changes to tax thresholds, and to entitlements and earnings disregards in benefits and refundable tax credits, affects work incentives for a given family over time.…”
Section: Measuring Work Incentives Using a Structural Dynamic Model mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some typical patterns of the effective marginal rates in the U.S. data are increasing, U-shaped, and inverted S-shaped (see CBO (2007) and Maag et al (2012)). …”
Section: Persistent Shocksmentioning
confidence: 99%