2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.09.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How marine debris ingestion differs among megafauna species in a tropical coastal area

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
26
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
2
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The frequency of juveniles stranded with ingested debris in Uruguay (South America) has been estimated at 73%, but reached 90% in Rio de la Plata -for both margins (Uruguay and Argentina/ GONZÁLEZ-CARMAN et al, 2014;TERYDA, 2015). Similarly, high frequencies of debris ingestion were observed along the Brazilian coast, and varied from ~60% to 100% in Rio Grande do Sul, southern Brazil (BUGONI et al, 2001;TOURINHO et al, 2010), 70% in Paraná state, southern Brazil (GUEBERT- BARTHOLO et al, 2011;GAMA et al, 2016), from 45% to 70% in São Paulo state, southeastern Brazil (BEZERRA, 2014;MENDES et al, 2015), ~60% from Rio de Janeiro to Espírito Santo state, southeastern Brazil (DiBENEDITTO; AWABDI, 2014;SANTOS et al, 2015) and 70% in Sergipe state, northeastern Brazil (SANTOS et al, 2015). It is interesting to note that the large frequencies of debris ingestion observed in Uruguay, Argentina and Brazil are a warning for the conservation of C. mydas, because these areas are considered to be part of an important migratory corridor in the southwestern Atlantic Ocean.…”
Section: Mortality and Morbidity Of Chelonia Mydas Associated With Humentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The frequency of juveniles stranded with ingested debris in Uruguay (South America) has been estimated at 73%, but reached 90% in Rio de la Plata -for both margins (Uruguay and Argentina/ GONZÁLEZ-CARMAN et al, 2014;TERYDA, 2015). Similarly, high frequencies of debris ingestion were observed along the Brazilian coast, and varied from ~60% to 100% in Rio Grande do Sul, southern Brazil (BUGONI et al, 2001;TOURINHO et al, 2010), 70% in Paraná state, southern Brazil (GUEBERT- BARTHOLO et al, 2011;GAMA et al, 2016), from 45% to 70% in São Paulo state, southeastern Brazil (BEZERRA, 2014;MENDES et al, 2015), ~60% from Rio de Janeiro to Espírito Santo state, southeastern Brazil (DiBENEDITTO; AWABDI, 2014;SANTOS et al, 2015) and 70% in Sergipe state, northeastern Brazil (SANTOS et al, 2015). It is interesting to note that the large frequencies of debris ingestion observed in Uruguay, Argentina and Brazil are a warning for the conservation of C. mydas, because these areas are considered to be part of an important migratory corridor in the southwestern Atlantic Ocean.…”
Section: Mortality and Morbidity Of Chelonia Mydas Associated With Humentioning
confidence: 96%
“…As a result, there is a rising concern about the negative effects that this form of pollution may have on sea life (Thompson et al, 2004;Moore, 2015). The levels of vulnerability and exposure of organisms to debris have been poorly explored (Moore, 2015), especially in the tropical oceans (Di Beneditto and Awabdi, 2014). Entanglements and ingestions are well documented for marine vertebrates such as fish, sea turtles, cetaceans, and seabirds (Hammer et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Debris ingestion has been documented in all sea turtle species and in all ocean basins, with an high variability of occurrence among different studies (Nelms et al, 2015;Schuyler et al, 2014a). Debris may be accidentally ingested if mixed with natural food (e.g., Di Beneditto and Awabdi, 2014), actively selected because similar to natural preys, like jellyfish (Hoarau et al, 2014;Schuyler et al, 2012;Schuyler et al, 2014b) or because encrusted by natural prey (Frick et al, 2009). Debris can obstruct, damage or cause inflammation of the digestive tract (Bjorndal et al, 1994;Di Beneditto and Awabdi, 2014;McCauley and Bjorndal, 1999;Vélez-Rubio et al, 2013), causing a reduced digestive capability and even death.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Debris may be accidentally ingested if mixed with natural food (e.g., Di Beneditto and Awabdi, 2014), actively selected because similar to natural preys, like jellyfish (Hoarau et al, 2014;Schuyler et al, 2012;Schuyler et al, 2014b) or because encrusted by natural prey (Frick et al, 2009). Debris can obstruct, damage or cause inflammation of the digestive tract (Bjorndal et al, 1994;Di Beneditto and Awabdi, 2014;McCauley and Bjorndal, 1999;Vélez-Rubio et al, 2013), causing a reduced digestive capability and even death. Even a small quantity of ingested debris can be lethal, at least in the green turtle Chelonia mydas (e.g., Bjorndal et al, 1994;Bugoni et al, 2001;Santos et al, 2015).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%