2019
DOI: 10.1111/dar.12905
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How might an individualised funding model impact on alcohol and other drug service users and service provision? Lessons from the Australian National Disability Insurance Scheme

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether integrated care that better meets clients’ needs can be achieved through a health‐focussed funding system, a social welfare‐focussed funding system or a client‐as‐fund‐holder system seems unlikely to be resolved any time soon. But perhaps this is not the right kind of question to be asking, as alluded to by MacLean and Anderson in drawing the issues of ‘deservingness’ to our attention. In our original piece we drew a link between the need for coordinated, integrated care on the ground, and the ways governments have shifted purchasing and funding arrangements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Whether integrated care that better meets clients’ needs can be achieved through a health‐focussed funding system, a social welfare‐focussed funding system or a client‐as‐fund‐holder system seems unlikely to be resolved any time soon. But perhaps this is not the right kind of question to be asking, as alluded to by MacLean and Anderson in drawing the issues of ‘deservingness’ to our attention. In our original piece we drew a link between the need for coordinated, integrated care on the ground, and the ways governments have shifted purchasing and funding arrangements.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could overcome the integrated care problem, as clients choose the care that they need, whether that be more health or social‐welfare‐focussed. MacLean and Anderson take up this thread and provide useful observations about how such a funding system may or may not work in the context of AOD treatment. For example, they point to the opportunity it can provide in empowering clients, but raise issues about the financial viability for service providers.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%