How mode of delivery affects comprehension of an operations management simulation

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to understand how mode of delivery, online versus face-to-face, affects comprehension when teaching operations management concepts via a simulation. Conceptually, the aim is to identify factors that influence the students’ ability to learn and retain new concepts. Design/methodology/approach Leveraging Littlefield Technologies’ simulation, the study investigates how team interaction, team leadership, instructor’s guidance, simulation’s ease of use and previous software experience affects comprehension for both online and face-to-face teaching environments. Survey data were gathered from 514 undergraduate students. The data were then analyzed using structural equation modeling. Findings For the face-to-face population, this study found that team interaction, previous software experience, instructor’s guidance and simulation’s ease of use affected student comprehension. This differed from the online population who were only affected by the simulation’s ease of use and instructor’s guidance. Originality/value Understanding how the mode of delivery affects comprehension is important as educators develop new online teaching techniques and experiment with innovative technologies like simulation. As demand for online education grows, many instructors find they need to refine their methods to ensure students comprehend the concepts being taught regardless of modality.

Secondary School Teachers and Learners Perspective for Future of Education Post COVID-19 Pandemic

“…In line with this, learners' willingness and activeness in carrying out online learning is directly proportional to the willingness and innovation of teachers in providing variety in e-learning (Dwivedi et al, 2019). The enthusiasm for learners' learning is determined by the ease of supporting software and the Teachers competence in mastering the teaching platform (Riley et al, 2017). On the other hand, learners' characteristics and needs in the learning process remain the main things that must be considered to create a good atmosphere of interaction during the teaching and learning process (Rahmawati et al, 2020).…”

Educommunication in digital environments: an interaction´s perspective inside and beyond the classroom

“…Today it is a challenge for teachers to generate spaces for proper use of language, listening skills, an adequate communicative environment in new spaces of digital connection. Examples of studies addressing these issues are in Riley et al (2017), Lorenzo (2017) or Zou and Thomas (2018).…”

Delivery mode and strategic management simulation outcomes

“…Experiential learning encourages active involvement of students in their learning (Benecke and Bezuidenhout, 2011), contrary to established "sage on the stage" instructional practices that regard learners and as inactive recipients of information (Bonwell and Eison, 1991;Levant et al, 2016;Stewart et al, 2012). Synthesizing various learning styles and improving concept utilization in realistic situations including simulations, games and role-playing scenarios (Hale et al, 2002;Riley et al, 2017) continues to evolve.…”

“…As noted above, Kolb's concepts of are often noted in research on simulations and DL (Eckhaus et al, 2017;Riley et al, 2017). Kolb states that learning is a process that creates knowledge through the "transformation of experience" (p. 23) (Kolb, 1984) and well-run simulations that measure learning can enhance the nature of the capstone course experience (Alstete and Beutell, 2019).…”

“…A number of studies have looked at business simulation outcomes in relation to delivery format. For example, Riley et al (2017) examined how delivery mode affects comprehension using an operations management simulation. Results showed that ease of use and instructor's guidance affect student comprehension.…”