2006
DOI: 10.1080/14459790600927738
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘How Much Do You Spend Gambling?’: Ambiguities in Questionnaire Items Assessing Expenditure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, even among educated medical students, only 32% to 64% interpret "how much do you spend gambling?" to mean net expenditure (Blaszczynski, Dumlao, & Lange, 1997). Many medical students interpreted it as initial outlay or total outlay (initial outlay + reinvestment of winnings).…”
Section: Ambiguous Question Wordingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even among educated medical students, only 32% to 64% interpret "how much do you spend gambling?" to mean net expenditure (Blaszczynski, Dumlao, & Lange, 1997). Many medical students interpreted it as initial outlay or total outlay (initial outlay + reinvestment of winnings).…”
Section: Ambiguous Question Wordingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation for the observed overreporting is that players may have misunderstood the question as having asked how much they bet instead of how much they actually lost (i.e., bets minus winnings) (Blaszczynski, Ladouceur, Goulet, & Savard, 2006). That being said, while the 2009 mean is strongly influenced by one outlier, who spent considerably more than others, an overreporting was also found in 2013, although to a lesser extent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…In other words, the information of interest is the net value of the money spent. Blaszczynski et al (1997) concluded that in response to this question, two-thirds of the respondents interpret this as their net expenditure. The rest of the respondents relate their answer to turnover or other alternative interpretations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the question asked how much the respondent spent on gambling. As shown by Blaszczynski et al (2006), this question is biased and is subject to ambiguity because the question "how much money do you spend gambling?" may be interpreted in different ways and may lead to misinterpretation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation