2006
DOI: 10.1089/elj.2006.5.40
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Much Is Enough? The "Ballot Order Effect" and the Use of Social Science Research in Election Law Disputes

Abstract: Abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
41
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The topic is almost as old as the political science discipline itself (Bagley 1966;Brooks 1921;Dana 1912;Gold 1952;Mackerras 1968;Mueller 1969;White 1950;Wilson 1912), but scientific interest only really took hold in the last quarter of the twentieth century (Bakker & Lijphart 1980;Bowler et al 1992;Brook & Upton 1974;Byrne & Pueschel 1974;Darcy 1986;Darcy & McAllister 1990;Hughes 1970;Kelley & McAllister 1984;Lijphart & Pintor 1988;Miller & Krosnick 1998;Robson & Walsh 1974;Scott 1977;Taebel 1975;Volcansek 1981) and it has not lost momentum after the turn of the millennium (Alvarez et al 2006;Brockington 2003;Chen et al 2014;Faas & Schoen 2006;Geys & Heyndels 2003;Ho & Imai 2008;Johnson & Miles 2011;Kim et al 2015;King & Leigh 2009;Koppell & Steen 2004;Krosnick et al 2004;Lutz 2010;Matson & Fine 2006;Meredith & Salant 2013;Villodres & de la Puerta 2006 Darcy and McAllister 1990) review of the early literature, most studies do not address this problem, but simply measure whether candidates in different positions on average do better...…”
Section: What We Already Know About Ballot Position and Ballot Layoutmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The topic is almost as old as the political science discipline itself (Bagley 1966;Brooks 1921;Dana 1912;Gold 1952;Mackerras 1968;Mueller 1969;White 1950;Wilson 1912), but scientific interest only really took hold in the last quarter of the twentieth century (Bakker & Lijphart 1980;Bowler et al 1992;Brook & Upton 1974;Byrne & Pueschel 1974;Darcy 1986;Darcy & McAllister 1990;Hughes 1970;Kelley & McAllister 1984;Lijphart & Pintor 1988;Miller & Krosnick 1998;Robson & Walsh 1974;Scott 1977;Taebel 1975;Volcansek 1981) and it has not lost momentum after the turn of the millennium (Alvarez et al 2006;Brockington 2003;Chen et al 2014;Faas & Schoen 2006;Geys & Heyndels 2003;Ho & Imai 2008;Johnson & Miles 2011;Kim et al 2015;King & Leigh 2009;Koppell & Steen 2004;Krosnick et al 2004;Lutz 2010;Matson & Fine 2006;Meredith & Salant 2013;Villodres & de la Puerta 2006 Darcy and McAllister 1990) review of the early literature, most studies do not address this problem, but simply measure whether candidates in different positions on average do better...…”
Section: What We Already Know About Ballot Position and Ballot Layoutmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Losers have often contested election results arguing that winners were unfairly favored by their position on the ballot. Cases have been taken before courts, which have often acknowledged ballot position effects and sometimes even annulled election results for this very reason (Alvarez et al 2006; see also Miller & Krosnick 1998). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a wellknown survey, Miller and Krosnick (1998) observe that while much of this literature concludes that candidates benefit from being listed first, the estimated effects are often small and the research designs often do not offer convincing identification of causal effects. The more recent literature that employs stronger research designs does not always find meaningful or consistent position effects (see Alvarez et al (2006) and Ho and Imai (2008), or in contrast Meredith and Yuval (2013)). Such ballot order effects as do exist are typically attributed to voters losing interest or ceasing to seek favorable information about candidates as they move down the ballot (satisficing).…”
Section: Existing Literaturementioning
confidence: 95%
“…But scientific interest really took hold in the last quarter of the twentieth century (Bakker & Lijphart 1980;Bowler et al 1992;Brook & Upton 1974;Byrne & Pueschel 1974;Darcy 1986;Darcy & McAllister 1990;Hughes 1970;Kelley & McAllister 1984;Lijphart & Pintor 1988;Miller & Krosnick 1998;Robson & Walsh 1974;Scott 1977;Taebel 1975;Volcansek 1981). After the turn of the millennium this interest has not lost momentum (Alvarez et al 2006;Brockington 2003;Chen et al 2014 The more recent literature recognizes the problem and turns to experimental methods to deal with it. In the following we focus on such studies -which also include some early contributions -in order to assess the current knowledge of name order effects, to identify lacunae in the literature and to argue for the added value of our study.…”
Section: What We Already Know About Ballot Position Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Losers have often contested election results arguing that winners were unfairly favored by their position on the ballot. Cases have been taken before courts, which have often acknowledged ballot position effects and sometimes annulled election results for this reason (Alvarez et al 2006; see also Miller and) Krosnick 1998).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%