How much is enough? the human factors of field of view in head-mounted displays

Melzer, Jim

doi:10.1117/12.2263334

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…While these helmets have the same requirements regarding the field of view, they do not have similar visors. [4] [5] These studies, therefore, cannot be used in the development of motorcycle helmets, more specifically, the verification of the requirements regarding the field of view of a motorcycle helmet. Although, these studies can be used as a reference to methodology.…”

Section: Objective and Subjective Evaluation Of Motorcycle Helmet Vis...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Objective and Subjective Evaluation of Motorcycle Helmet Visors Based on ECE 22.05 Regulations

Nguyễn

Vanderlooven

Velden

et al. 2021

Advances in Physical, Social &Amp; Occupational Ergonomics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

With the growing demand for helmet mounted displays on motorcycle helmets, it is essential not to compromise the peripheral vision of the motorcyclist. The relevant European standard of motorcycle helmet visors ECE 22-05, equivalent to the DOT standard FMVSS 218, states that the visor should permit peripheral vision horizontally through an arc of 105° from the helmet midline and vertically through an arc of 52°, which is located 7° upwards and 45° downward from the eyes. Consequently, this study compares a 3D environment to a human testing environment and an controlled testing environment using standard headforms to create an objective method to verify the correct field of view of motorcycle helmets. Firstly, the 3D environment is developed in Solidworks and provides a simulation set up that validates the necessary field of view in reference to the ECE 22-05. This environment is matched up to the testing environment with test subjects that are familiar with the use of a motorcycle helmet. The fields of view were determined by 12 indication points for 9 different motorcycle helmet models. The downwards tilt of the helmet of each test subject was individually determined. Each participant was additionally tested with a control helmet. The control helmet was also 3D scanned for use in the 3D environment. This provides a reference for the tilt of the helmet in the other two objective evaluation methods. With an average downwards angle of 21.1 degrees down, the control helmet has a success rate of 66.7% in the testing environment with the test subjects, although a number of external factors influence the determination of the field of view of the test subjects. Lastly, a field of view was generated by means of a human headform model into which a Ricoh Theta 360 camera was inserted. This results in an objective field of view for the control helmet. The synthesized downwards angle was implemented in the 3D environment to generate a 3D render of the field of view with the 3D scan of the control helmet. The render shows a similar field of view to the field of view generated by the Ricoh Theta 360 camera, resulting in a confirmation of the validity of the 3D model. Combining these three methods of testing, guarantees an objective evaluation of motorcycle helmet visors.

show abstract

Section: Objective and Subjective Evaluation Of Motorcycle Helmet Vis...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Objective and Subjective Evaluation of Motorcycle Helmet Visors Based on ECE 22.05 Regulations

Nguyễn

Vanderlooven

Velden

et al. 2021

Advances in Physical, Social &Amp; Occupational Ergonomics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…AoE optimal (AoE max ) sama dengan 45° juga didukung oleh penelitian-penelitian di bidang virtual dan augmented reality tentang kemampuan alat untuk meniru cara melihat manusia (Melzer, 2017;Ramadan et al, 2017). Sebagai contoh, Melzer (2017) menulis bahwa pemahaman tentang ruang akan lebih banyak didapat oleh manusia bila AoE lebih besar daripada 45°.…”

Section: Pembahasanunclassified

“…Kenyataan ini menarik karena FOV vertikal tersebut pada dasarnya identik dengan AoE max = 45° yang dilaporkan dalam tulisan ini. Jadi bisa dilihat tentang adanya relevansi antara pengaruh AoE terhadap preferensi dengan pengaruh FOV vertikal terhadap kemudahan gerak manusia dalam ruang AoE optimal (AoE max) sama dengan 45.87° juga didukung oleh penelitian-penelitian dan pengembangan di bidang virtual dan augmented reality tentang kemampuan alat untuk meniru cara melihat manusia (Melzer, 2017;Ramadan et al, 2017). Sebagai contoh, Melzer (2017) menyatakan bahwa sudut padang vertikal yang optimal untuk virtual reality adalah 40°, hal ini terlihat relevan dengan AoE max = 45.87° yang dilaporkan dalam tulisan ini.…”

Section: Pembahasanunclassified

Penentuan Sudut Pandang Vertikal (Angle of Elevation) Optimal Ruang Terbuka Rumah

Purnomo¹

2019

J. PENELITIAN DAN KARYA ILMIAH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sudut pandang vertikal atau angle of elevation (AoE) adalah indikator yang sering dipakai untuk memperkirakan kesan keterlingkupan atau sense of eclosure (SoE) sebuah ruang terbuka. Berbeda dengan penelitian lain, tujuan penelitian ini ialah untuk mempelajari pengaruh AoE pada preferensi manusia akan ruang terbuka. Dihipotesakan bahwa preferensi kepada ruang terbuka sebuah rumah dipengaruhi oleh AoE secara kuadratik. Dari data yang telah terkumpul dapat disimpulkan bahwa ada persamaan kuadratik AoE yang secara signifikan berpengaruh terhadap preferensi manusia akan ruang terbuka (R 2 = 0.976). Dari persamaan kuadratik tersebut diperoleh AoE optimal (AoE max ) sama dengan 46.87  . AoE max bisa digunakan untuk merancang sebuah ruang terbuka agar ruang yang dirancang tersebut memiliki preferensi yang optimal.

show abstract

How much is enough? the human factors of field of view in head-mounted displays

Cited by 2 publications

References 27 publications

Objective and Subjective Evaluation of Motorcycle Helmet Visors Based on ECE 22.05 Regulations

Objective and Subjective Evaluation of Motorcycle Helmet Visors Based on ECE 22.05 Regulations

Penentuan Sudut Pandang Vertikal (Angle of Elevation) Optimal Ruang Terbuka Rumah

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About