2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2021.103292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How much is too much? Systematic review of cumulative doses from radiological imaging and the risk of cancer in children and young adults

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
12
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…the brain cancer is considered to be the 10th leading cause of death in both women and men. In 2019, around 17 760 adults (7850 women and 9910 men) were estimated to have died from the primary cancerous brain (Marcu, et al, 2021). Every year, hundreds of thousands of patients worldwide undergo radiotherapy for primary brain tumors and for brain metastases originating from extracranial tumors (Reichl, et al, 2022).…”
Section: Significance Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the brain cancer is considered to be the 10th leading cause of death in both women and men. In 2019, around 17 760 adults (7850 women and 9910 men) were estimated to have died from the primary cancerous brain (Marcu, et al, 2021). Every year, hundreds of thousands of patients worldwide undergo radiotherapy for primary brain tumors and for brain metastases originating from extracranial tumors (Reichl, et al, 2022).…”
Section: Significance Of the Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The recent work of Marcu et al. ( 21 ) offers a systematic review on epidemiological studies covering cumulative doses and cancer risks in children and young adults’ examinations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number and complexity of fluoroscopically guided procedures continue to grow, as does the concern over elevated levels of radiation dose. The rising number of high dose imaging investigations increases the stochastic risk of oncogenesis with lengthy procedures also resulting in patient skin erythema [ 1 ]. Radiation exposure in the catheterization laboratory (cath lab) is notably higher than that of other fluoroscopic departments [ 2 ], and increased rates of subcapsular cataracts have been reported in cath lab staff [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%