1991
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.1991.02160110117034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Much of Neonatal Encephalopathy Is due to Birth Asphyxia?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
109
0
14

Year Published

1997
1997
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 144 publications
(125 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
2
109
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…3,4 Presumed hypoxia-ischaemia is diagnosed based on reduced Apgar scores and acidosis, 5 and the combination of progressive hypoxia, hypercarbia, and acidosis is often referred to as asphyxia. 6 Encephalopathy resulting from hypoxia-ischaemia can be clearly diagnosed only in a small number of cases in which a sentinel event, such as placental abruption, uterine rupture, cord prolapse, or shoulder dystocia, is clearly present.…”
Section: Perinatal Brain Injury In the Term-born Infantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,4 Presumed hypoxia-ischaemia is diagnosed based on reduced Apgar scores and acidosis, 5 and the combination of progressive hypoxia, hypercarbia, and acidosis is often referred to as asphyxia. 6 Encephalopathy resulting from hypoxia-ischaemia can be clearly diagnosed only in a small number of cases in which a sentinel event, such as placental abruption, uterine rupture, cord prolapse, or shoulder dystocia, is clearly present.…”
Section: Perinatal Brain Injury In the Term-born Infantmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infants with encephalopathy were defined as term babies (≥ 37 weeks) who in the first week of life developed either seizures alone or any two of the following lasting for more than 24 hours: abnormal consciousness, abnormal tone, poor feeding of presumed central origin, and/or an inability to initiate or maintain respiration, also of presumed central origin (Nelson and Leviton 1991). Encephalopathy was graded as moderate or severe according to criteria modified from Sarnat and Sarnat (1976).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Newborn encephalopathy is a syndrome of disturbed neurological function in the first week of life associated with significant morbidity and mortality (Nelson and Leviton 1991). Most previous studies have included only those infants thought to have had intrapartum hypoxia, and most have either excluded infants with birth defects (Ziegler et al 1976, Finer et al 1981, Low et al 1985, Robertson and Finer 1985, Gaffney et al 1994, Thornberg et al 1995 or have not mentioned whether infants with birth defects had been included or excluded (Levene et al 1985, Hull andDodd 1992).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 Furthermore, implicated are antepartum insults, direct injuries or increased susceptibility to injury that occur well before the birth process, as well as congenital and metabolic birth defects. [1][2][3]10 Although the causes of neonatal encephalopathy are likely heterogeneous, a model of cerebral hypoxic-ischemic injury that begins in utero and extends into a recovery period is increasingly suggested and has been used as a model of study. 11 Hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) is the most well-recognized and studied cause of neonatal encephalopathy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%