2015
DOI: 10.1097/ico.0000000000000604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Much Progress Has Been Made in Corneal Transplantation?

Abstract: To assess the benefits of component lamellar corneal surgery, we investigated the surgical outcomes of deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) for keratoconus and Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) for laser iridotomy-induced bullous keratopathy (LI-BK). The results were compared with the surgical outcomes of penetrating keratoplasty (PKP). Seventy-nine eyes with keratoconus treated with DALK and 81 eyes with LI-BK treated with DSAEK were studied, and the graft clarity rate, best … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A total of 2224 patients’ 11 graft survival rates from 9 studies [ 20 , 21 , 23 , 25 , 26 , 28 31 ] were analyzed. Three years after treatment with DALK, the merged graft survival rate was (95% CI): 92.9% (89.8–95.9%), P < .001 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A total of 2224 patients’ 11 graft survival rates from 9 studies [ 20 , 21 , 23 , 25 , 26 , 28 31 ] were analyzed. Three years after treatment with DALK, the merged graft survival rate was (95% CI): 92.9% (89.8–95.9%), P < .001 (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ten survival rates of 1970 patients from 8 studies [ 21 , 22 , 24 26 , 29 – 31 ] were analyzed in this 5-year graft survival rate analysis. The merged graft survival rate was (95% CI): 90.4% (86.0–94.8%), P < .001 with a significant heterogeneity (I 2 value: 93.5%) (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). In both techniques, it is important to separate the Descemet membrane from the posterior stroma, both in the donor and in the recipient, and then adding the healthy part that the recipient is missing, achieving advantages that penetrating keratoplasty cannot overcome [9][10][11] .…”
Section: Anatomy and Corneal Histology Applied To The Clinicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). En ambas técnicas es importante separar la membrana de Descemet del estroma posterior, tanto en el donador como en el receptor, para posteriormente agregarle la parte sana que haga falta al receptor, y lograr así ventajas que el injerto penetrante no puede superar [9][10][11] .…”
Section: Anatomía E Histología Corneal Aplicadas a La Clínicaunclassified