2020
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238319
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How much water can wood cell walls hold? A triangulation approach to determine the maximum cell wall moisture content

Abstract: Wood is a porous, hygroscopic material with engineering properties that depend significantly on the amount of water (moisture) in the material. Water in wood can be present in both cell walls and the porous void-structure of the material, but it is only water in cell walls that affects the engineering properties. An important characteristic of wood is therefore the capacity for water of its solid cell walls, i.e. the maximum cell wall moisture content. However, this quantity is not straightforward to determine… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7b). This supports that even though the cell wall moisture content is underestimated in LFNMR-measurements at room temperature (Beck et al 2018b;Thybring et al 2020a), it is still possible to compare different groups of specimens. One difference between the results in the hygroscopic range and in water saturated state was, however, that a slight reduction in moisture content and thus moisture exclusion efficiency was seen also for interface modification 1 in the hygroscopic range (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7b). This supports that even though the cell wall moisture content is underestimated in LFNMR-measurements at room temperature (Beck et al 2018b;Thybring et al 2020a), it is still possible to compare different groups of specimens. One difference between the results in the hygroscopic range and in water saturated state was, however, that a slight reduction in moisture content and thus moisture exclusion efficiency was seen also for interface modification 1 in the hygroscopic range (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…This is most likely caused by a reduced lumen volume, primarily in latewood, because of the acetylation induced swelling of cell walls as observed by Sander et al (2003). Note that evaluation of cell wall moisture contents from LFNMR measurements above 0°C underestimates the absolute value of the cell wall moisture content (Beck et al 2018b;Thybring et al 2020a). Therefore, the absolute value of the cell wall moisture content in Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…5 Moisture content as a function of time measured by DVS and the normalized height of the azimuthal peak and A-term from the WoodSAS model (Eq. 2) as determined by SANS while the lumina are empty (Thybring et al 2020). However, FSP is a theoretical value usually measured at equilibrium, while the spruce sample measured is a macroscopic object and the drying rate is so fast that the system is nowhere near equilibrium.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This will have the property of reducing the glass transition temperature of the wood cell wall matrix, resulting in a decrease in sorption hysteresis [143,144]; assuming that water molecules are able to penetrate the PEG-cell wall polymer void system. Higher MW PEGs do not enter the sound cell wall [145], but the extent of penetration of the pore structure of degraded wood by PEGs of different sizes is not known. Nanopores exhibit a partitioning effect on solutions of PEGs of different MW (and radius of gyration) and that changing the concentration of PEG in solution influences the radius of gyration [146].…”
Section: Sorption Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%