2013
DOI: 10.1086/668086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How Naive Theories Drive Opposing Inferences from the Same Information

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
104
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(112 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
5
104
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, they often make inferences to fill in these gaps. These inferences have been referred to as naïve theories and serve as common-sense explanations to evaluate and make inferences regarding marketing communication, products and brands (Deval, Mantel, Kardes and Posavac, 2013). Two naïve theories may be linked to the need for uniqueness and conformity: the naive theory of exclusivity or the belief that exclusive products are desirable (Berger and Heath, 2007), and the naive theory of popularity or the belief that popular products are desirable, similar to "bandwagon" effects (Henshel and Johnston, 1987;Deval et al, 2013).…”
Section: The Moderating Impact Of Product Divergence On the Relation mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, they often make inferences to fill in these gaps. These inferences have been referred to as naïve theories and serve as common-sense explanations to evaluate and make inferences regarding marketing communication, products and brands (Deval, Mantel, Kardes and Posavac, 2013). Two naïve theories may be linked to the need for uniqueness and conformity: the naive theory of exclusivity or the belief that exclusive products are desirable (Berger and Heath, 2007), and the naive theory of popularity or the belief that popular products are desirable, similar to "bandwagon" effects (Henshel and Johnston, 1987;Deval et al, 2013).…”
Section: The Moderating Impact Of Product Divergence On the Relation mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The expectation is that status may act as a safeguard against any negative evaluative tendencies that arise due to aesthetic incongruity, but that the extent to which aesthetic incongruity and status influence the value judgments of a set of artworks depends on the knowledge or expertise of the art consumer (cf. Deval, Mantel, Kardes, & Posavac, ).…”
Section: Theoretical Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What sets core consumers apart from casual consumers is that they can draw on a richer, more refined body of domain knowledge (Alba & Hutchinson, ; Deval et al., ; Wänke, Bless, & Schwarz, ). The mental models of core consumers about what constitutes merit in art should make them less susceptible to the influence of status cues, as they are presumably better able to judge the intrinsic quality of the product.…”
Section: Theoretical Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations