2022
DOI: 10.1007/s11069-022-05374-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

How natural disasters affect carbon emissions: the global case

Abstract: The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has once again made the impacts of natural disasters a hot topic in academia. The environmental impacts of natural disasters, however, remain unsettled in the existing literature. This study aims to investigate the impact of natural disasters on CO 2 emissions. For this purpose, we employ a panel dataset covering 138 countries over the period 1990–2018 and two dynamic panel estimation methods. Then, considering the differences in CO 2 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lastly, unidirectional causality is found from natural disasters to CO2 emissions, implying that events such as wildfires or volcanic eruptions can contribute to increased CO2 emissions. The result of this study is supported by [57][58][59]. Similarly, unidirectional causality from natural disasters to non-renewable energy consumption suggests that occurrences like landslides and earthquakes can disrupt the production and consumption of non-renewable energy sources.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lastly, unidirectional causality is found from natural disasters to CO2 emissions, implying that events such as wildfires or volcanic eruptions can contribute to increased CO2 emissions. The result of this study is supported by [57][58][59]. Similarly, unidirectional causality from natural disasters to non-renewable energy consumption suggests that occurrences like landslides and earthquakes can disrupt the production and consumption of non-renewable energy sources.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…This supposition argues disasters reduce economic activity and energy consumption, thereby decreasing CO2 emissions [53][54][55][56]. Analyzing 138 countries revealed that disasters substantially lower CO2 emissions by directly and indirectly reducing energy consumption, where technological progress strongly influences this trend [57]. Nevertheless, the precise mechanisms linking disasters and CO2 emissions remain unclear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dou et al used a set of panel data from 138 countries to test the relationships between natural disasters and carbon dioxide emissions through panel quantile regression. Their empirical results showed that natural disasters significantly reduced carbon emissions, where natural disasters directly reduced carbon emissions but also indirectly contributed to carbon reduction by curbing energy consumption, and the level of technology was an important moderator of the relationship between natural disasters and carbon emissions [22]. In the current research literature, there is a lack of reliable conclusions on how natural disasters affect carbon emissions.…”
Section: Impacts Of Natural Disasters On Energy Consumption and Carbo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we constructed an econometric analysis model with carbon dioxide emissions as the explanatory variable, and GDP and natural disasters as the main explanatory variables. According to previous research by Baig [4], Dou [22], Dong [25], and Kasman et al [26], new energy was also included in the analysis framework, and we defined the multi-factor theoretical model of carbon emission as follows:…”
Section: Model Constructionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang, Rasool [5] and Bekhet and Othman [6] suggested that urbanization positively affects CO2 emissions. However, Dou, Shahbaz [7] revealed that urbanization in China could significantly reduce CO2 emissions. The implication of reducing CO2 emissions happens because of the policies that recommend the use of clean energy use, including wind energy, bioenergy, hydropower, solar energy, and tidal energy.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%